Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28034883›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2017

An Evidence-Based Algorithm for Early Prognosis of Severe Dengue in the Outpatient Setting.

Minh Tuan Nguyen, Thi Nhan Ho, Van Vinh Chau Nguyen, Thanh Hung Nguyen, Manh Tuan Ha, Van Tram Ta, Le Da Ha Nguyen, Loi Phan, Khoi Quang Han, Thi Hue Kien Duong and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic Models in Patients with Dengue: A Systematic Review.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Dengue Fever—Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Treatment.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Minh Tuan NguyenChildren's Hospital No. 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Thi Nhan HoOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Oxford, England, UK.
Van Vinh Chau NguyenOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Oxford, England, UK.
Thanh Hung NguyenChildren's Hospital No. 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Manh Tuan HaChildren's Hospital No. 2, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Van Tram TaTien Giang Provincial Hospital, My Tho, Vietnam.
Le Da Ha NguyenDong Nai Children's Hospital, Bien Hoa, Vietnam.
Loi PhanLong An Provincial Hospital, Tan An, Vietnam.
Khoi Quang HanBinh Duong Provincial Hospital, Thu Dau Mot, Vietnam.
Thi Hue Kien DuongOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Oxford, England, UK.
Nguyen Bich Chau TranOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Oxford, England, UK.
Bridget WillsOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Oxford, England, UK.
Marcel WolbersOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Oxford, England, UK.
Cameron P SimmonsOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Oxford, England, UK.
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit · VNAngkor Hospital for Children · KHCity Children's Hospital No. 22 · RUBình Dương University · VNHospital for Tropical Diseases · VNTien Giang General Hospital · VNUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early prediction of severe dengue could significantly assist patient triage and case management. Methods: We prospectively investigated 7563 children with ≤3 days of fever recruited in the outpatient departments of 6 hospitals in southern Vietnam between 2010 and 2013. The primary endpoint of interest was severe dengue (2009 World Health Organization Guidelines), and predefined risk variables were collected at the time of enrollment to enable prognostic model development. Results: The analysis population comprised 7544 patients, of whom 2060 (27.3%) had laboratory-confirmed dengue; nested among these were 117 (1.5%) severe cases. In the multivariate logistic model, a history of vomiting, lower platelet count, elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level, positivity in the nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) rapid test, and viremia magnitude were all independently associated with severe dengue. The final prognostic model (Early Severe Dengue Identifier [ESDI]) included history of vomiting, platelet count, AST level. and NS1 rapid test status. Conclusions: The ESDI had acceptable performance features (area under the curve = 0.95, sensitivity 87% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80%-92%), specificity 88% (95% CI, 87%-89%), positive predictive value 10% (95% CI, 9%-12%), and negative predictive value of 99% (95% CI, 98%-100%) in the population of all 7563 enrolled children. A score chart, for routine clinical use, was derived from the prognostic model and could improve triage and management of children presenting with fever in dengue-endemic areas.

Indexed as

OutpatientsAlgorithmsBiomarkersChildChild, PreschoolDengue VirusFemaleHumansMaleNomogramsOdds RatioPopulation SurveillancePrognosisProspective StudiesROC CurveSevere DengueBiomarkersdenguediagnosistropical infectious diseases.

Identifiers

PMID28034883
PMCPMC5850639
OpenAlexW2562700000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.