Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28034750›Full record

ArticleBiochemical and biophysical research communications2017

Computing the binding affinity of a ligand buried deep inside a protein with the hybrid steered molecular dynamics.

Oscar D Villarreal, Lili Yu, Roberto A Rodriguez, Liao Y Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Accelerating Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Drug Discovery.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Computational Tools for Accurate Binding Free-Energy Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How Good is Jarzynski's Equality for Computer-Aided Drug Design?The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oscar D VillarrealDepartment of Physics, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA.
Lili YuDepartment of Physics, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yancheng Vocational Institute of Health Sciences, Yancheng, Jiangsu 224006, PR China.
Roberto A RodriguezDepartment of Physics, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA.
Liao Y ChenDepartment of Physics, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA. Electronic address: Liao.Chen@utsa.edu.

Funding

Theoretical study of structure-function correlations of Aquaporin V and mutantsSC3GM084834 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI CHEN, LIAO Y · 2008 to 2016
$865k
NIGMS NIH HHS SC3 GM084834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computing the ligand-protein binding affinity (or the Gibbs free energy) with chemical accuracy has long been a challenge for which many methods/approaches have been developed and refined with various successful applications. False positives and, even more harmful, false negatives have been and still are a common occurrence in practical applications. Inevitable in all approaches are the errors in the force field parameters we obtain from quantum mechanical computation and/or empirical fittings for the intra- and inter-molecular interactions. These errors propagate to the final results of the computed binding affinities even if we were able to perfectly implement the statistical mechanics of all the processes relevant to a given problem. And they are actually amplified to various degrees even in the mature, sophisticated computational approaches. In particular, the free energy perturbation (alchemical) approaches amplify the errors in the force field parameters because they rely on extracting the small differences between similarly large numbers. In this paper, we develop a hybrid steered molecular dynamics (hSMD) approach to the difficult binding problems of a ligand buried deep inside a protein. Sampling the transition along a physical (not alchemical) dissociation path of opening up the binding cavity---pulling out the ligand---closing back the cavity, we can avoid the problem of error amplifications by not relying on small differences between similar numbers. We tested this new form of hSMD on retinol inside cellular retinol-binding protein 1 and three cases of a ligand (a benzylacetate, a 2-nitrothiophene, and a benzene) inside a T4 lysozyme L99A/M102Q(H) double mutant. In all cases, we obtained binding free energies in close agreement with the experimentally measured values. This indicates that the force field parameters we employed are accurate and that hSMD (a brute force, unsophisticated approach) is free from the problem of error amplification suffered by many sophisticated approaches in the literature.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationBenzeneBenzyl CompoundsBinding SitesLigandsMuramidaseMutationProtein ConformationProteinsRetinol-Binding Proteins, CellularThiophenesVitamin ABenzenebenzyl acetateBenzyl CompoundsLigandsMuramidaseProteinsRBP1 protein, humanRetinol-Binding Proteins, CellularThiophenesVitamin ABinding affinityLigand-protein interactionMolecular dynamicsRetinol-binding proteinT4-lysozyme mutants

Identifiers

PMID28034750
PMCPMC5253313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.