ArticleBiochemical and biophysical research communications2017
Computing the binding affinity of a ligand buried deep inside a protein with the hybrid steered molecular dynamics.
Article in Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Probing Limitations of Co-Alchemical Charge Changes in Free-Energy Calculations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Accelerating Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Drug Discovery.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Determination of Multidirectional Pathways for Ligand Release from the Receptor: A New Approach Based on Differential Evolution.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2022Article
- Computational Tools for Accurate Binding Free-Energy Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Dependence of Work on the Pulling Speed in Mechanical Ligand Unbinding.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2021Article
- Charge-Changing Perturbations and Path Sampling via Classical Molecular Dynamic Simulations of Simple Guest-Host Systems.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2020Article
- Ligand Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics (LiGaMD): Characterization of Ligand Binding Thermodynamics and Kinetics.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2020Article
- How Good is Jarzynski's Equality for Computer-Aided Drug Design?The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2020Article
- Free-energy landscape of molecular interactions between endothelin 1 and human endothelin type B receptor: fly-casting mechanism.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2019Article
- De Novo Prediction of Binders and Nonbinders for T4 Lysozyme by gREST Simulations.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computing the ligand-protein binding affinity (or the Gibbs free energy) with chemical accuracy has long been a challenge for which many methods/approaches have been developed and refined with various successful applications. False positives and, even more harmful, false negatives have been and still are a common occurrence in practical applications. Inevitable in all approaches are the errors in the force field parameters we obtain from quantum mechanical computation and/or empirical fittings for the intra- and inter-molecular interactions. These errors propagate to the final results of the computed binding affinities even if we were able to perfectly implement the statistical mechanics of all the processes relevant to a given problem. And they are actually amplified to various degrees even in the mature, sophisticated computational approaches. In particular, the free energy perturbation (alchemical) approaches amplify the errors in the force field parameters because they rely on extracting the small differences between similarly large numbers. In this paper, we develop a hybrid steered molecular dynamics (hSMD) approach to the difficult binding problems of a ligand buried deep inside a protein. Sampling the transition along a physical (not alchemical) dissociation path of opening up the binding cavity---pulling out the ligand---closing back the cavity, we can avoid the problem of error amplifications by not relying on small differences between similar numbers. We tested this new form of hSMD on retinol inside cellular retinol-binding protein 1 and three cases of a ligand (a benzylacetate, a 2-nitrothiophene, and a benzene) inside a T4 lysozyme L99A/M102Q(H) double mutant. In all cases, we obtained binding free energies in close agreement with the experimentally measured values. This indicates that the force field parameters we employed are accurate and that hSMD (a brute force, unsophisticated approach) is free from the problem of error amplification suffered by many sophisticated approaches in the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.