ArticleAppetite2018
Behavioral evidence that select carbohydrate stimuli activate T1R-independent receptor mechanisms.
Article in Appetite, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sugar type and route of delivery influence insulin and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide responses in rats.American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
- Altered peripheral taste function in a mouse model of inflammatory bowel disease.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Dietary experience with glucose and fructose fosters heightened avidity for glucose-containing sugars independent of TRPM5 taste transduction in mice.Nutritional neuroscience · 2023Article
- The elusive cephalic phase insulin response: triggers, mechanisms, and functions.Physiological reviews · 2023Review
- Taste perception of cyclic oligosaccharides: α, β, and γ cyclodextrins.Chemical senses · 2022Article
- Contribution of macronutrients to obesity: implications for precision nutrition.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2020Review
- Presence of carbohydrate binding modules in extracellular region of class C G-protein coupled receptors (C GPCR): AnJournal of biosciences · 2019Article
- FGF21 Signals Protein Status to the Brain and Adaptively Regulates Food Choice and Metabolism.Cell reports · 2019Article
- EEG discrimination of perceptually similar tastes.Journal of neuroscience research · 2019Article
- From appetite setpoint to appetition: 50years of ingestive behavior research.Physiology & behavior · 2018Review
- Carbohydrate craving: not everything is sweet.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2017Review
- Evidence supporting oral sensitivity to complex carbohydrates independent of sweet taste sensitivity in humans.PloS one · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Three decades ago Tony Sclafani proposed the existence of a polysaccharide taste quality that was distinguishable from the taste generated by common sweeteners and that it was mediated by a separate receptor mechanism. Since that time, evidence has accumulated, including psychophysical studies conducted in our laboratory, buttressing this hypothesis. The use of knockout (KO) mice that lack functional T1R2 + T1R3 heterodimers, the principal taste receptor for sugars and other sweeteners, have been especially informative in this regard. Such KO mice display severely diminished electrophysiological and behavioral responsiveness to sugars, artificial sweeteners, and some amino acids, yet display only slightly impaired concentration-dependent responsiveness to a representative polysaccharide, Polycose. Moreover, although results from gene deletion experiments in the literature provide strong support for the primacy of the T1R2 + T1R3 heterodimer in the taste transduction of sugars and other sweeteners, there is also growing evidence suggesting that there may be T1R-independent receptor mechanism(s) activated by select sugars, especially glucose. The output of these latter receptor mechanisms appears to be channeled into brain circuits subserving various taste functions such as cephalic phase responses and ingestive motivation. This paper highlights some of the findings from our laboratory and others that lend support for this view, while emphasizing the importance of considering the multidimensional nature of taste function in the interpretation of outcomes from experiments involving manipulations of the gustatory system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.