Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28034739›Full record

ArticleAppetite2018

Behavioral evidence that select carbohydrate stimuli activate T1R-independent receptor mechanisms.

Alan C Spector, Lindsey A Schier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. EEG discrimination of perceptually similar tastes.Journal of neuroscience research · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Carbohydrate craving: not everything is sweet.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alan C SpectorDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, United States. Electronic address: spector@psy.fsu.edu.
Lindsey A SchierDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, United States.
Florida State University · US

Funding

PSYCHOPHYSICAL EVALUATION OF TASTE FUNCTIONR01DC004574 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SPECTOR, ALAN C · 2001 to 2019
$4.4M
FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF PERIPHERAL GUSTATORY SYSTEMR01DC001628 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SPECTOR, ALAN C · 1994 to 2007
$1.7M
Psychophysical assessment of postgastric chemospecificinfluences on tasteF32DC013494 · NIDCD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHIER, LINDSEY A · 2013 to 2014
$81k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC013494NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC001628NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three decades ago Tony Sclafani proposed the existence of a polysaccharide taste quality that was distinguishable from the taste generated by common sweeteners and that it was mediated by a separate receptor mechanism. Since that time, evidence has accumulated, including psychophysical studies conducted in our laboratory, buttressing this hypothesis. The use of knockout (KO) mice that lack functional T1R2 + T1R3 heterodimers, the principal taste receptor for sugars and other sweeteners, have been especially informative in this regard. Such KO mice display severely diminished electrophysiological and behavioral responsiveness to sugars, artificial sweeteners, and some amino acids, yet display only slightly impaired concentration-dependent responsiveness to a representative polysaccharide, Polycose. Moreover, although results from gene deletion experiments in the literature provide strong support for the primacy of the T1R2 + T1R3 heterodimer in the taste transduction of sugars and other sweeteners, there is also growing evidence suggesting that there may be T1R-independent receptor mechanism(s) activated by select sugars, especially glucose. The output of these latter receptor mechanisms appears to be channeled into brain circuits subserving various taste functions such as cephalic phase responses and ingestive motivation. This paper highlights some of the findings from our laboratory and others that lend support for this view, while emphasizing the importance of considering the multidimensional nature of taste function in the interpretation of outcomes from experiments involving manipulations of the gustatory system.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalAnimalsDietary CarbohydratesMiceMice, KnockoutReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledTasteTaste BudsDietary CarbohydratesReceptors, G-Protein-Coupledtaste receptors, type 1Cephalic phase reflexesGlucose receptorInsulinPolysaccharide tasteSweet tasteT1R heterodimers

Identifiers

PMID28034739
PMCPMC5484755
OpenAlexW2561394447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.