Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28034596›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]

Changes in the microbial community during bioremediation of gasoline-contaminated soil.

Aline Jaime Leal, Edmo Montes Rodrigues, Patrícia Lopes Leal, Aline Daniela Lopes Júlio, Rita de Cássia Rocha Fernandes, Arnaldo Chaer Borges, Marcos Rogério Tótola

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aline Jaime LealInstituto Federal Sul-rio-grandense, Bagé, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Edmo Montes RodriguesUniversidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Microbiologia, Laboratório de Biotecnologia Ambiental e Biodiversidade, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Electronic address: edmomontes@yahoo.com.br.
Patrícia Lopes LealUniversidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Microbiologia, Laboratório de Biotecnologia Ambiental e Biodiversidade, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Aline Daniela Lopes JúlioUniversidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Microbiologia, Laboratório de Biotecnologia Ambiental e Biodiversidade, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Rita de Cássia Rocha FernandesUniversidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Microbiologia, Laboratório de Biotecnologia Ambiental e Biodiversidade, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Arnaldo Chaer BorgesUniversidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Microbiologia, Laboratório de Biotecnologia Ambiental e Biodiversidade, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Marcos Rogério TótolaUniversidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Microbiologia, Laboratório de Biotecnologia Ambiental e Biodiversidade, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Electronic address: totolaufv@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to verify the changes in the microbial community during bioremediation of gasoline-contaminated soil. Microbial inoculants were produced from successive additions of gasoline to municipal solid waste compost (MSWC) previously fertilized with nitrogen-phosphorous. To obtain Inoculant A, fertilized MSWC was amended with gasoline every 3 days during 18 days. Inoculant B received the same application, but at every 6 days. Inoculant C included MSWC fertilized with N-P, but no gasoline. The inoculants were applied to gasoline-contaminated soil at 10, 30, or 50g/kg. Mineralization of gasoline hydrocarbons in soil was evaluated by respirometric analysis. The viability of the inoculants was evaluated after 103 days of storage under refrigeration or room temperature. The relative proportions of microbial groups in the inoculants and soil were evaluated by FAME. The dose of 50g/kg of inoculants A and B led to the largest CO

Indexed as

GasolineSoil MicrobiologyBacterial LoadBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBiotaCarbon DioxideCarcinogens, EnvironmentalHydrocarbonsSoil PollutantsCarbon DioxideCarcinogens, EnvironmentalGasolineHydrocarbonsSoil PollutantsBioremediationGasoline degradationInoculant storageMicrobial inoculantsSoil contamination

Identifiers

PMID28034596
PMCPMC5470457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.