Importance of implementation economics for program planning-evaluation of CDC's colorectal cancer control program.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Extending analytic methods for economic evaluation in implementation science.Implementation science : IS · 2022
   Article
2. Role of an Implementation Economics Analysis in Providing the Evidence Base for Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening.Preventing chronic disease · 2020
   Article
3. Costs of promoting cancer screening: Evidence from CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP).Evaluation and program planning · 2017
   Article
4. Costs of colorectal cancer screening provision in CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program: Comparisons of colonoscopy and FOBT/FIT based screening.Evaluation and program planning · 2017
   Article
5. Cardiovascular Screening and Lipid Management in Breast Cancer Survivors.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as