ArticleEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)2017
Apoptotic capacity and risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Article in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- DNA Damage Response Network and Intracellular Redox Status in the Clinical Outcome of Patients with Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2024Article
- METTL3 modulates m6A modification of CDC25B and promotes head and neck squamous cell carcinoma malignant progression.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2022Article
- The DNA damage response network in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.ESMO open · 2021Article
- Diagnostic and prognostic value ofJournal of Cancer · 2021Article
- Identification and validation of a prognostic signature and combination drug therapy for immunotherapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- The Expression and Effection of MicroRNA-499a in High-Tobacco Exposed Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Bioinformatic Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTobacco smoke and alcohol drinking are the major risk factors for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Smoking and drinking cause DNA damage leading to apoptosis, and insufficient apoptotic capacity may favour development of cancer because of the dysfunction of removing damaged cells. In the present study, we investigated the association between camptothecin (CPT)-induced apoptotic capacity and risk of SCCHN in a North American population.
methodsIn a case-control study of 708 SCCHN patients and 685 matched cancer-free controls, we measured apoptotic capacity in cultured peripheral blood lymphocytes in response to in vitro exposure to CPT by using the flow cytometry-based method.
resultsWe found that the mean level of apoptotic capacity in the cases (45.9 ± 23.3%) was significantly lower than that in the controls (49.0 ± 23.1%) (P = 0.002). When we used the median level of apoptotic capacity in the controls as the cutoff value for calculating adjusted odds ratios, subjects with a reduced apoptotic capacity had an increased risk (adjusted odds ratio = 1.42, 95% confidence interval = 1.13-1.78, P = 0.002), especially for those who were age ≥57 (1.73, 1.25-2.38, 0.0009), men (1.76, 1.36-2.27, <0.0001) and ever drinkers (1.67, 1.27-2.21, 0.0003), and these variables significantly interacted with apoptotic capacity (P
conclusionIndividuals with a reduced CPT-induced apoptotic capacity may be at an increased risk of developing SCCHN, and apoptotic capacity may be a biomarker for susceptibility to SCCHN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.