Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28033346›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2016

Improving Phylogeny Reconstruction at the Strain Level Using Peptidome Datasets.

Aitor Blanco-Míguez, Jan P Meier-Kolthoff, Alberto Gutiérrez-Jácome, Markus Göker, Florentino Fdez-Riverola, Borja Sánchez, Anália Lourenço

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aitor Blanco-MíguezESEI-Department of Computer Science, University of Vigo, Edificio Politécnico, Campus Universitario As Lagoas s/n, Ourense, Spain.
Jan P Meier-KolthoffLeibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH, Inhoffenstraße 7B, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9105-9814
Alberto Gutiérrez-JácomeESEI-Department of Computer Science, University of Vigo, Edificio Politécnico, Campus Universitario As Lagoas s/n, Ourense, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9949-1705
Markus GökerLeibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH, Inhoffenstraße 7B, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5144-6200
Florentino Fdez-RiverolaESEI-Department of Computer Science, University of Vigo, Edificio Politécnico, Campus Universitario As Lagoas s/n, Ourense, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3943-8013
Borja SánchezDepartment of Microbiology and Biochemistry of Dairy Products, Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias (IPLA), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Villaviciosa, Asturias, Spain.
Anália LourençoESEI-Department of Computer Science, University of Vigo, Edificio Politécnico, Campus Universitario As Lagoas s/n, Ourense, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8401-5362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Typical bacterial strain differentiation methods are often challenged by high genetic similarity between strains. To address this problem, we introduce a novel in silico peptide fingerprinting method based on conventional wet-lab protocols that enables the identification of potential strain-specific peptides. These can be further investigated using in vitro approaches, laying a foundation for the development of biomarker detection and application-specific methods. This novel method aims at reducing large amounts of comparative peptide data to binary matrices while maintaining a high phylogenetic resolution. The underlying case study concerns the Bacillus cereus group, namely the differentiation of Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacillus anthracis and Bacillus cereus strains. Results show that trees based on cytoplasmic and extracellular peptidomes are only marginally in conflict with those based on whole proteomes, as inferred by the established Genome-BLAST Distance Phylogeny (GBDP) method. Hence, these results indicate that the two approaches can most likely be used complementarily even in other organismal groups. The obtained results confirm previous reports about the misclassification of many strains within the B. cereus group. Moreover, our method was able to separate the B. anthracis strains with high resolution, similarly to the GBDP results as benchmarked via Bayesian inference and both Maximum Likelihood and Maximum Parsimony. In addition to the presented phylogenomic applications, whole-peptide fingerprinting might also become a valuable complementary technique to digital DNA-DNA hybridization, notably for bacterial classification at the species and subspecies level in the future.

Indexed as

BacillusBacterial ProteinsDatabases, ProteinDNA, BacterialModels, GeneticPeptidesPhylogenyProteomeProteomicsSpecies SpecificityBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialPeptidesProteome

Identifiers

PMID28033346
PMCPMC5198984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.