Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28033343›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2016

Former Buruli Ulcer Patients' Experiences and Wishes May Serve as a Guide to Further Improve Buruli Ulcer Management.

Anita Velink, Rebecca J Woolley, Richard O Phillips, Kabiru M Abass, Tjip S van der Werf, Emmanuel Agumah, Janine de Zeeuw, Sandor Klis, Ymkje Stienstra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Buruli ulcer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  4. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Buruli Ulcer: a Review of the Current Knowledge.Current tropical medicine reports · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anita VelinkUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rebecca J WoolleyUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Richard O PhillipsKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, School of Medical Sciences, Department of Medicine, Kumasi, Ghana.
Kabiru M AbassAgogo Presbyterian Hospital, Agogo, Ghana.
Tjip S van der WerfUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Internal Medicine/Infectious Diseases, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Emmanuel AgumahPresident and founder of Buruli ulcer Victims Aid (BUVA) foundation, Kumasi, Ghana.
Janine de ZeeuwUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Internal Medicine/Infectious Diseases, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sandor KlisUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Internal Medicine/Infectious Diseases, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ymkje StienstraUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Internal Medicine/Infectious Diseases, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8844-8859
University Medical Center Groningen · NLKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology · GHPresbyterian University, Ghana · GH

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J01477X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBuruli ulcer (BU), caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans, is a neglected tropical disease frequently leading to permanent disabilities. The ulcers are treated with rifampicin and streptomycin, wound care and, if necessary surgical intervention. Professionals have exclusively shaped the research agenda concerning management and control, while patients' perspective on priorities and preferences have not explicitly been explored or addressed. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsTo get insight into patient perception of the management and control of Buruli ulcer a mixed methods research design was applied with a questionnaire and focus group discussions among former BU patients. Data collection was obtained in collaboration with a local team of native speakers in Ghana. A questionnaire was completed by 60 former patients and four focus group discussions were conducted with eight participants per group. Former patients positively evaluated both the effectiveness of the treatment and the financial contribution received for the travel costs to the hospitals. Pain experienced during treatment procedures, in particular wound care and the streptomycin injections, and the side-effects of the treatment were negatively evaluated. Former patients considered the development of preventive measures and knowledge on the transmission as priorities. Additionally, former patients asked for improved accessibility of health services, counselling and economic support.

conclusionsThese findings can be used to improve clinical management and to guide the international research agenda.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBuruli UlcerFemaleFocus GroupsGhanaHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium ulceransRifampinStreptomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsRifampinStreptomycin

Identifiers

PMID28033343
PMCPMC5226828
OpenAlexW2568974333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.