Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28033329›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Myoinositol as a Biomarker in Recurrent Glioblastoma Treated with Bevacizumab: A 1H-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study.

Eike Steidl, Ulrich Pilatus, Elke Hattingen, Joachim P Steinbach, Friedhelm Zanella, Michael W Ronellenfitsch, Oliver Bähr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eike SteidlDr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Center for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7464-0236
Ulrich PilatusInstitute of Neuroradiology, Center for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Elke HattingenInstitute of Neuroradiology, Center for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Joachim P SteinbachDr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Center for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Friedhelm ZanellaInstitute of Neuroradiology, Center for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Michael W RonellenfitschDr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Center for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Oliver BährDr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Center for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntiangiogenic treatment of glioblastomas with Bevacizumab lacks predictive markers. Myoinositol (MI) is an organic osmolyte, with intracellular concentration changes depending on the extracellular osmolality. Since Bevacizumab markedly reduces tumor edema and influences the tumor microenvironment, we investigated whether the MI concentration in the tumor changes during therapy.

methodsWe used 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure the MI concentrations in the tumor and contralateral control tissue of 39 prospectively recruited patients with recurrent glioblastomas before and 8-12 weeks after starting therapy. 30 patients received Bevacizumab and 9 patients were treated with CCNU/VM26 as control. We performed a survival analysis to evaluate MI as a predictive biomarker for Bevacizumab therapy.

resultsMI concentrations increased significantly during Bevacizumab therapy in tumor (p < .001) and control tissue (p = .001), but not during CCNU/VM26 treatment. For the Bevacizumab cohort, higher MI concentrations in the control tissue at baseline (p = .021) and higher differences between control and tumor tissue (delta MI, p = .011) were associated with longer survival. A Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a median OS of 164 days for patients with a deltaMI < 1,817 mmol/l and 275 days for patients with a deltaMI > 1,817 mmol/l. No differences were observed for the relative changes or the post treatment concentrations. Additionally calculated creatine concentrations showed no differences in between subgroups or between pre and post treatment measurements.

conclusionOur data suggest that recurrent glioblastoma shows a strong metabolic reaction to Bevacizumab. Further, our results support the hypothesis that MI might be a marker for early tumor cell invasion. Pre-therapeutic MI concentrations are predictive of overall survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with Bevacizumab.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsBevacizumabBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGlioblastomaHumansHydrogenInositolLomustineMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsBevacizumabBiomarkers, TumorHydrogenInositolLomustineTeniposideVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28033329
PMCPMC5198997
OpenAlexW2567621550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.