Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28033322›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Using Respondent Driven Sampling to Identify Malaria Risks and Occupational Networks among Migrant Workers in Ranong, Thailand.

Piyaporn Wangroongsarb, Jimee Hwang, Julie Thwing, Samart Karuchit, Suthon Kumpetch, Alison Rand, Chris Drakeley, John R MacArthur, S Patrick Kachur, Wichai Satimai and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Using Serological Markers for the Surveillance ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Piyaporn WangroongsarbBureau of Vector Borne Diseases, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonathaburi, Thailand.
Jimee HwangU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, Malaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Julie ThwingMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Samart KaruchitThailand MOPH-US CDC Collaboration, Nonathaburi, Thailand.
Suthon KumpetchRanong Provincial Health Office, Ministry of Public Health, Ranong, Thailand.
Alison RandDepartment of Infectious & Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Chris DrakeleyDepartment of Infectious & Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
John R MacArthurThailand MOPH-US CDC Collaboration, Nonathaburi, Thailand.
S Patrick KachurMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Wichai SatimaiBureau of Vector Borne Diseases, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonathaburi, Thailand.
Sylvia MeekMalaria Consortium, London, United Kingdom.
David M SintasathU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, USAID/RDMA, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ministry of Public Health · THCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMalaria Consortium · GBU.S. President's Malaria Initiative · US

Funding

NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRanong Province in southern Thailand is one of the primary entry points for migrants entering Thailand from Myanmar, and borders Kawthaung Township in Myanmar where artemisinin resistance in malaria parasites has been detected. Areas of high population movement could increase the risk of spread of artemisinin resistance in this region and beyond.

methodsA respondent-driven sampling (RDS) methodology was used to compare migrant populations coming from Myanmar in urban (Site 1) vs. rural (Site 2) settings in Ranong, Thailand. The RDS methodology collected information on knowledge, attitudes, and practices for malaria, travel and occupational histories, as well as social network size and structure. Individuals enrolled were screened for malaria by microscopy, Real Time-PCR, and serology.

resultsA total of 619 participants were recruited in Ranong City and 623 participants in Kraburi, a rural sub-district. By PCR, a total of 14 (1.1%) samples were positive (2 P. falciparum in Site 1; 10 P. vivax, 1 Pf, and 1 P. malariae in Site 2). PCR analysis demonstrated an overall weighted prevalence of 0.5% (95% CI, 0-1.3%) in the urban site and 1.0% (95% CI, 0.5-1.7%) in the rural site for all parasite species. PCR positivity did not correlate with serological positivity; however, as expected there was a strong association between antibody prevalence and both age and exposure. Access to long-lasting insecticidal treated nets remains low despite relatively high reported traditional net use among these populations.

conclusionsThe low malaria prevalence, relatively smaller networks among migrants in rural settings, and limited frequency of travel to and from other areas of malaria transmission in Myanmar, suggest that the risk for the spread of artemisinin resistance from this area may be limited in these networks currently but may have implications for regional malaria elimination efforts.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntimalarialsArtemisininsDrug ResistanceFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMalariaMaleMiddle AgedOccupational ExposureRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesThailandAntimalarialsartemisininArtemisinins

Identifiers

PMID28033322
PMCPMC5199010
OpenAlexW2565431180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.