Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28033032›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2017

Dynamic and Personalized Risk Forecast in Step-Down Units. Implications for Monitoring Paradigms.

Lujie Chen, Olufunmilayo Ogundele, Gilles Clermont, Marilyn Hravnak, Michael R Pinsky, Artur W Dubrawski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Medicine.Critical care (London, England) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Intelligent Clinical Decision Support.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lujie Chen1 Auton Laboratory, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7185-8405
Olufunmilayo Ogundele2 LifeBridge Critical Care, Sinai Hospital Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland.
Gilles Clermont3 Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and.
Marilyn Hravnak4 Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Michael R Pinsky3 Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and.
Artur W Dubrawski1 Auton Laboratory, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Predicting Patient Instability Noninvasively for Nursing Care-Two (PPINNC-2)R01NR013912 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI AL-ZAITI, SALAH S, CLERMONT, GILLES · 2012 to 2025
$7.0M
Multidisciplinary Training in Critical Care Outcomes ResearchT32HL007820 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Timothy D Girard, Jeremy M Kahn · 1996 to 2026
$6.4M
Understanding Regional Critical Care Delivery in Acute Respiratory FailureK08HL122478 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WALLACE, DAVID JOHN · 2015 to 2018
$606k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL122478NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007820NINR NIH HHS R01 NR013912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleCardiorespiratory insufficiency (CRI) is a term applied to the manifestations of loss of normal cardiorespiratory reserve and portends a bad outcome. CRI occurs commonly in hospitalized patients, but its risk escalation patterns are unexplored.

objectivesTo describe the dynamic and personal character of CRI risk evolution observed through continuous vital sign monitoring of individual step-down unit patients.

methodsUsing a machine learning model, we estimated risk trends for CRI (defined as exceedance of vital sign stability thresholds) for each of 1,971 admissions (1,880 unique patients) to a 24-bed adult surgical trauma step-down unit at an urban teaching hospital in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania using continuously recorded vital signs from standard bedside monitors. We compared and contrasted risk trends during initial 4-hour periods after step-down unit admission, and again during the 4 hours immediately before the CRI event, between cases (ever had a CRI) and control subjects (never had a CRI). We further explored heterogeneity of risk escalation patterns during the 4 hours before CRI among cases, comparing personalized to nonpersonalized risk. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsEstimated risk was significantly higher for cases (918) than control subjects (1,053; P ≤ 0.001) during the initial 4-hour stable periods. Among cases, the aggregated nonpersonalized risk trend increased 2 hours before the CRI, whereas the personalized risk trend became significantly different from control subjects 90 minutes ahead. We further discovered several unique phenotypes of risk escalation patterns among cases for nonpersonalized (14.6% persistently high risk, 18.6% early onset, 66.8% late onset) and personalized risk (7.7% persistently high risk, 8.9% early onset, 83.4% late onset).

conclusionsInsights from this proof-of-concept analysis may guide design of dynamic and personalized monitoring systems that predict CRI, taking into account the triage and real-time monitoring utility of vital signs. These monitoring systems may prove useful in the dynamic allocation of technological and clinical personnel resources in acute care hospitals.

Indexed as

Vital SignsAdultAgedCritical CareFemaleHealth Status IndicatorsHospitalizationHospitals, TeachingHumansIntermediate Care FacilitiesLogistic ModelsMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicPennsylvaniaearly warning scorefinite mixture modelinstabilitymachine learningphysiologic monitoring

Identifiers

PMID28033032
PMCPMC5427723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.