Observational studyJournal of human hypertension2017
Preventive effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on new-onset atrial fibrillation in hypertensive patients: a propensity score matching analysis.
Observational study in Journal of human hypertension, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2019Guideline
- Renin-angiotensin blockade in atrial fibrillation: where are we now?Journal of human hypertension · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is still controversial whether treatment with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors reduces the risk of incident atrial fibrillation (AF). This longitudinal observational study was performed to investigate the confounder-independent effects of RAS inhibitors on new-onset AF in hypertensive patients. Among 1263 consecutive hypertensive patients who underwent echocardiography, 964 eligible patients (mean age, 63 years) were enrolled as the study population. Forty-nine patients developed new-onset AF during the follow-up period (mean: 4.6 years). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the cumulative AF event rate was lower in patients receiving RAS inhibitors than in patients without these drugs, but the difference between these two groups was not significant (P=0.057). Since the use of RAS inhibitors was influenced by concomitant diabetes, chronic kidney disease and left ventricular hypertrophy, propensity score matching (1:1) was employed to minimize the influence of selection bias for RAS inhibitors. Clinical and echocardiographic parameters showed no significant differences between the propensity score-matched groups with and without RAS inhibitor therapy (both n=326), but the cumulative AF event rate was significantly lower in the group receiving RAS inhibitors (P=0.013). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses also revealed that RAS inhibitor therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of new-onset AF during the follow-up period. In conclusion, this propensity score matching study demonstrated that the incidence of new-onset AF was lower in hypertensive patients receiving RAS inhibitor therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.