Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28032344›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied behavior analysis2017

Further analysis of subtypes of automatically reinforced SIB: A replication and quantitative analysis of published datasets.

Louis P Hagopian, Griffin W Rooker, Jennifer R Zarcone, Andrew C Bonner, Alexander R Arevalo

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03995966 (A Clinical Trial for Treatment-Resistant Subtypes of Self-Injurious Behavior), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03995966 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Clinical Trial for Treatment-Resistant Subtypes of Self-Injurious Behavior

TypeinterventionalSponsorHugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.Ran2019 to 2026Enrolled16ConditionsSelf-Injurious BehaviorArmsNoncontingent Reinforcement (NCR), Combination Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Competing stimulus assessments: A systematic review.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Bouts, Pauses, and Units of Operant Performance: A Primer.Perspectives on behavior science · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Further evidence of renewal in automatically maintained behavior.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Deep brain stimulation for autism spectrum disorder.World journal of psychiatry · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Louis P HagopianThe Kennedy Krieger Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Griffin W RookerThe Kennedy Krieger Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Jennifer R ZarconeThe Kennedy Krieger Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Andrew C BonnerThe Kennedy Krieger Institute, University of Maryland Baltimore County.
Alexander R ArevaloThe Kennedy Krieger Institute.

Funding

Translational Neuroscience CoreU54HD079123 · NICHD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI FATEMI, S. ALI, SCHLAGGAR, BRADLEY L · 2014 to 2019
$7.9M
Treatment Generalization and Contingency CoherenceP01HD055456 · NICHD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI HAGOPIAN, LOUIS P. · 2009 to 2013
$4.6M
Delineating Subtypes of Self-Injurious Behavior Maintained by Automatic ReinforceR01HD076653 · NICHD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI HAGOPIAN, LOUIS P. · 2013 to 2024
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD055456NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD076653NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD079123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hagopian, Rooker, and Zarcone (2015) evaluated a model for subtyping automatically reinforced self-injurious behavior (SIB) based on its sensitivity to changes in functional analysis conditions and the presence of self-restraint. The current study tested the generality of the model by applying it to all datasets of automatically reinforced SIB published from 1982 to 2015. We identified 49 datasets that included sufficient data to permit subtyping. Similar to the original study, Subtype-1 SIB was generally amenable to treatment using reinforcement alone, whereas Subtype-2 SIB was not. Conclusions could not be drawn about Subtype-3 SIB due to the small number of datasets. Nevertheless, the findings support the generality of the model and suggest that sensitivity of SIB to disruption by alternative reinforcement is an important dimension of automatically reinforced SIB. Findings also suggest that automatically reinforced SIB should no longer be considered a single category and that additional research is needed to better understand and treat Subtype-2 SIB.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAdolescentBehavior TherapyChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, BibliographicData CompressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleSelf-Injurious BehaviorYoung Adultautomatic reinforcementfunctional analysisself-injurious behavior

Identifiers

PMID28032344
PMCPMC5292128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.