Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28032343›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of physiology2017

Tracking motor units longitudinally across experimental sessions with high-density surface electromyography.

E Martinez-Valdes, F Negro, C M Laine, D Falla, F Mayer, D Farina

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04361149 (Evaluation of Motor Unit Abnormalities After Experimentally Induced Sensitization Using Capsaicin), which is not on this map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04361149 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Motor Unit Abnormalities After Experimentally Induced Sensitization Using Capsaicin: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorToronto Rehabilitation InstituteRan2019 to 2020Enrolled23ConditionsCentral Sensitisation, Motor DisordersArmsCapsaicin Topical Cream (0.075%), Delsys Trigno Galileo System, Excaliber, Natus Medical, Placebo Cream
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Projection of Cortical Beta Band Oscillations to a Motor Neuron Pool across the Full Range of Recruitment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

E Martinez-ValdesDepartment of Sports Medicine and Sports Orthopaedics, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
F NegroInstitute of Neurorehabilitation Systems, Bernstein Focus Neurotechnology Göttingen (BFNT), Bernstein Centre for Computational Neuroscience (BCCN), University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany.
C M LaineInstitute of Neurorehabilitation Systems, Bernstein Focus Neurotechnology Göttingen (BFNT), Bernstein Centre for Computational Neuroscience (BCCN), University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany.
D FallaCentre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
F MayerDepartment of Sports Medicine and Sports Orthopaedics, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
D FarinaInstitute of Neurorehabilitation Systems, Bernstein Focus Neurotechnology Göttingen (BFNT), Bernstein Centre for Computational Neuroscience (BCCN), University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7883-2697

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsClassic motor unit (MU) recording and analysis methods do not allow the same MUs to be tracked across different experimental sessions, and therefore, there is limited experimental evidence on the adjustments in MU properties following training or during the progression of neuromuscular disorders. We propose a new processing method to track the same MUs across experimental sessions (separated by weeks) by using high-density surface electromyography. The application of the proposed method in two experiments showed that individual MUs can be identified reliably in measurements separated by weeks and that changes in properties of the tracked MUs across experimental sessions can be identified with high sensitivity. These results indicate that the behaviour and properties of the same MUs can be monitored across multiple testing sessions. The proposed method opens new possibilities in the understanding of adjustments in motor unit properties due to training interventions or the progression of pathologies. ABSTRACT: A new method is proposed for tracking individual motor units (MUs) across multiple experimental sessions on different days. The technique is based on a novel decomposition approach for high-density surface electromyography and was tested with two experimental studies for reliability and sensitivity. Experiment I (reliability): ten participants performed isometric knee extensions at 10, 30, 50 and 70% of their maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) force in three sessions, each separated by 1 week. Experiment II (sensitivity): seven participants performed 2 weeks of endurance training (cycling) and were tested pre-post intervention during isometric knee extensions at 10 and 30% MVC. The reliability (Experiment I) and sensitivity (Experiment II) of the measured MU properties were compared for the MUs tracked across sessions, with respect to all MUs identified in each session. In Experiment I, on average 38.3% and 40.1% of the identified MUs could be tracked across two sessions (1 and 2 weeks apart), for the vastus medialis and vastus lateralis, respectively. Moreover, the properties of the tracked MUs were more reliable across sessions than those of the full set of identified MUs (intra-class correlation coefficients ranged between 0.63-0.99 and 0.39-0.95, respectively). In Experiment II, ∼40% of the MUs could be tracked before and after the training intervention and training-induced changes in MU conduction velocity had an effect size of 2.1 (tracked MUs) and 1.5 (group of all identified motor units). These results show the possibility of monitoring MU properties longitudinally to document the effect of interventions or the progression of neuromuscular disorders.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAdultElectromyographyExerciseHumansIsometric ContractionKneeMaleMotor NeuronsPhysical EnduranceQuadriceps MuscleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28032343
PMCPMC5330923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.