Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28032320›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2017

No Medium-Term Spinocerebellar Input Plasticity in Deep Cerebellar Nuclear Neurons In Vivo?

Hannes Mogensen, Fredrik Bengtsson, Henrik Jörntell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Structure of Long-Range Direct and Indirect Spinocerebellar Pathways as Well as Local Spinal Circuits Mediating Proprioception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Long-Lasting Response Changes in Deep Cerebellar NucleiFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hannes MogensenNeural Basis of Sensorimotor Control, Department of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, BMC F10, Tornavägen 10, 221 84, Lund, Sweden.
Fredrik BengtssonNeural Basis of Sensorimotor Control, Department of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, BMC F10, Tornavägen 10, 221 84, Lund, Sweden.
Henrik JörntellNeural Basis of Sensorimotor Control, Department of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, BMC F10, Tornavägen 10, 221 84, Lund, Sweden. henrik.jorntell@med.lu.se.
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The existence of input plasticity in the deep cerebellar nuclear (DCN) cells of the adult cerebellum could have profound implications for our understanding of cerebellar function. Whereas the existence of plastic changes in mossy fiber (mf) synaptic responses in DCN neurons has been demonstrated in juvenile slices, there has so far been no direct demonstration of this form of plasticity in the adult cerebellum in vivo. In the present paper, we recorded from neurons in the anterior interposed nucleus (AIN) and stimulated the spinocerebellar tracts (SCT) directly or via the skin to obtain mf activation and the inferior olive to activate climbing fibers (cfs) in the nonanesthetized, adult, decerebrated cat. We used three different types of protocols that theoretically could be expected to induce plasticity, each of which involved episodically intense afferent activation lasting for 10 min. These were conjunctive mf-cf activation, which effectively induces plasticity in cortical neurons; mf and cf activation in a pattern resembling the protocol for inducing classical conditioning; and conjunctive activation of two excitatory mf inputs. None of these protocols had any statistically significant effect on the evoked responses in the AIN neurons. We conclude that the input plasticity for excitatory mfs in the AIN cells of the adult cerebellum in vivo is likely to be less effective than that of parallel fiber synaptic inputs in cerebellar cortical cells, at least in the timespan of 1 h.

Indexed as

AnimalsCatsCerebellar CortexCerebellar NucleiNerve FibersNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsPurkinje CellsClimbing fibersDeep cerebellar nuclear neuronsMossy fibersPlasticity

Identifiers

PMID28032320
PMCPMC5427151
OpenAlexW2565369328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.