Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28032267›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2017

Flower Visitors of Campanula: Are Oligoleges More Sensitive to Host-Specific Floral Scents Than Polyleges?

Katharina Brandt, Stefan Dötterl, Wittko Francke, Manfred Ayasse, Paulo Milet-Pinheiro

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katharina BrandtInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Stefan DötterlDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Wittko FranckeInstitut für Organische Chemie, University of Hamburg, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.
Manfred AyasseInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Paulo Milet-PinheiroInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany. miletpinheiro@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pollen diet provided by adult bees to their offspring varies immensely. While some species collect pollen on several plants irrespective of their phylogenetic relatedness (polyleges), others collect only on plants within a genus or family (oligoleges). Floral scents play a central role in bee-plant interactions. To locate flowers, polyleges are assumed to rely on compounds commonly found as floral scent constituents, whereas oligoleges rely on unusual compounds to recognize host flowers unambiguously. Campanula flowers are visited by both polylectic and oligolectic species, and their scent bouquets consist of common and unusual (e.g., spiroacetals) volatiles. In a comparative approach, we performed electroantennographic analyses to investigate the antennal responses of three polyleges and three oligoleges to three common volatiles and four spiroacetals. We hypothesized that: 1) oligoleges and polyleges should respond similarly to common flower volatiles, and 2) Campanula oligoleges should be more sensitive to spiroacetals than are polyleges. In corroboration, we found that antennal sensitivity to common volatiles was similar among bees irrespective of pollen diet, whereas oligoleges of Campanula were more sensitive to spiroacetals than polyleges. Newly emerged bees of the Campanula oligolege Chelostoma rapunculi rely on spiroacetals for recognizing host-flowers, and our results suggest that this might also be true for other Campanula oligoleges, since Chelostoma campanularum and Hoplitis mitis also were able to perceive these specific volatiles at very low concentrations. Together, our results provide interesting insights into the significance of olfactory adaptations in oligolectic and polylectic bee species.

Indexed as

CampanulaceaePollinationAcetalsAnimalsArthropod AntennaeBeesElectrophysiological PhenomenaFemaleFlowersOdorantsSpecies SpecificitySpiro CompoundsAcetalsSpiro CompoundsElectroantennography (EAG)Floral scentsOlfactory receptorsOligolectyPolylectySpiroacetals

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.