Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28032255›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2017

Treatment recommendations for schizophrenia, major depression and alcohol dependence and stigmatizing attitudes of the public: results from a German population survey.

Sven Speerforck, Georg Schomerus, Herbert Matschinger, Matthias C Angermeyer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of contact-based, short-term anti-stigma training for medical students : Results from a randomized controlled trial.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2020
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sven SpeerforckDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medicine, Greifswald University, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17475, Greifswald, Germany. sven.speerforck@uni-greifswald.de.
Georg SchomerusDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medicine, Greifswald University, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Herbert MatschingerInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Matthias C AngermeyerDepartment of Public Health, Clinical and Molecular Psychiatry, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Cagliari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to mental health literacy, several potentially conflicting emotions and attitudes among the public are hypothesized to guide their recommendations for specific mental health treatments. It is unclear whether evidence-based treatment strategies are guided by pro-social or stigmatizing attitudes and emotions. In a representative population survey in Germany (n = 3642), we asked respondents to what extent they would recommend psychotropic medication, psychotherapy and relaxation techniques for a person with mental illness described in an unlabelled vignette. For each treatment recommendation, we used multinomial logistic regression analyses to obtain predicted probabilities. Predictors comprised illness recognition, vignette condition, causal beliefs (current stress, childhood adversities, biogenetic), emotions (fear, anger, pro-social reactions), social distance, age, gender and education. Fear predicted greater probability for recommending psychotropic drugs in all investigated illnesses (p < 0.001), whereas associations of fear with recommending psychotherapy were generally lower and no associations with the recommendation for relaxation techniques were found. Anger was related to fewer recommendations for psychotherapy in all illnesses (p < 0.01). Pro-social reactions were predominantly related to the recommendation of relaxation techniques for a person with schizophrenia or major depression (p < 0.001). Higher desire for social distance predicted fewer recommendations for relaxation techniques in all three vignette conditions (p < 0.05). Our study corroborates findings that treatment recommendations are not necessarily linked to pro-social reactions or mental health literacy. The recommendation for a treatment modality like psychotropic medication or psychotherapy can be linked to underlying fear, possibly reflecting a public desire for protection against people with mental illness.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthSchizophrenic PsychologySocial StigmaAdolescentAdultAgedAge DistributionAlcoholismFemaleGermanyHealth SurveysHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedSchizophreniaEmotionsHelp seekingPopulation surveySocial distanceStigmaTreatment recommendation

Identifiers

PMID28032255
OpenAlexW2561187932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.