Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28032122›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2017

Predictors of outcome after manipulation under anaesthesia in patients with a stiff total knee arthroplasty.

L Vanlommel, T Luyckx, G Vercruysse, J Bellemans, H Vandenneucker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Risk factors for failure of manipulation under anesthesia after total knee arthroplasty.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Patients undergoing manipulation after total knee arthroplasty are at higher risk of revision within 2 years.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Improved clinical outcomes after revision arthroplasty with a hinged implant for severely stiff total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. [Open arthrolysis for stiff knee after primary total knee arthroplasty].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L VanlommelDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Leuven, B-3000, Louvain, Belgium. luc.vanlommel@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6462-8196
T LuyckxDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Leuven, B-3000, Louvain, Belgium.
G VercruysseDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Leuven, B-3000, Louvain, Belgium.
J BellemansDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hospital Genk, UHASSELT - University of Hasselt, B-3600, Genk, Belgium.
H VandenneuckerDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Leuven, B-3000, Louvain, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEHasselt University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFlexion in a stiff total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be improved by manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA). Although this intervention usually results in an improvement in range of motion, the expected result is not always achieved. The purpose of this study is to determine which factors affect range of motion after manipulation in patients with a stiff total knee.

methodsAfter exclusion (n = 22), the data of 158 patients (138 knees) with a stiff knee after TKA who received a manipulation under anaesthesia between 2004 and 2014 were retrospectively analysed. Pre-, peri- and post-operative variables were identified and examined for their influence on flexion after the manipulation using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests and Spearman correlations.

resultsAfter MUA, a mean improvement in flexion of 30.3° was observed at the final follow-up. Preoperative TKA flexion, design of TKA and interval between TKA procedure and MUA were positive associated with an increase in flexion after MUA. MUA performed 12 weeks or more after TKA procedure deteriorated the outcome.

conclusionsThree factors, pre-TKA flexion type of prosthesis and interval between TKA procedure and manipulation under anaesthesia, were found to have impact on flexion after TKA and MUA were identified. Results are expected to be inferior in patients with low flexion before TKA procedure or with a long interval (>12 weeks) between the TKA procedure and the manipulation under anaesthesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

Range of Motion, ArticularAgedAnesthesia, EpiduralAnesthesia, GeneralArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleManipulation, OrthopedicMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis DesignRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsArthrofibrosisFlexionMobilization under anaesthesiaStiffnessTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID28032122
OpenAlexW2565222883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.