ArticleJournal of arthropod-borne diseases2016
Current Susceptibility Status of
Article in Journal of arthropod-borne diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evolution of insecticide resistance and its mechanisms in Anopheles stephensi in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region.Malaria journal · 2020Pooled it
- Historical Overview of the Bionomics ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2026Review
- Environmental persistence and transmission dynamics ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Preliminary monitoring of knockdown resistance (kdr) mutation in Anopheles stephensi: insights from a malarious area in Southeastern Iran.Malaria journal · 2024Article
- Comparative Effects ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the Time Course on the Effectiveness of WHO Standard Pyrethroid and Carbamate Impregnated Test Papers againstJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2023Article
- Susceptibility ofVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2022Article
- Monitoring of synthetic insecticides resistance and mechanisms among malaria vector mosquitoes in Iran: A systematic review.Heliyon · 2022Review
- Pathogenic fungi infection attributes of malarial vectors Anopheles maculipennis and Anopheles superpictus in central Iran.Malaria journal · 2021Article
- Insecticide Resistance Status of Malaria Vectors in a Malarious Area, Southeast of Iran.Journal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2021Article
- Monitoring and Mapping of Insecticide Resistance in Medically Important Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Iran (2000-2020): A Review.Journal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2021Review
- Spatial Modelling of Malaria in South of Iran in Line with the Implementation of the Malaria Elimination Program: A Bayesian Poisson-Gamma Random Field Model.Journal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2021Article
- Utility of Complete Mitochondrial Genomes in Phylogenetic Classification of the Species of Anopheles (Culicidae: Anophelinae).Journal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2021Review
- Ecology of Malaria Vectors in an Endemic Area, Southeast of Iran.Journal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2020Article
- First Report of Target Site Insensitivity in Pyrethroid ResistantJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2020Article
- Insecticide resistance in Anopheles stephensi in Somali Region, eastern Ethiopia.Malaria journal · 2020Article
- Baseline Susceptibility ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2019Article
- Investigation of Susceptibility Levels ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2019Article
- Status of insecticide resistance and its biochemical and molecular mechanisms in Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae) from Afghanistan.Malaria journal · 2019Article
- Comparison of CDC Bottle Bioassay with WHO Standard Method for Assessment Susceptibility Level of Malaria Vector,Journal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
methodsIn the present study seven insecticides including: DDT 4%, lambdacyhalothrin 0.05%, deltamethrin 0.05%, permethrin 0.75%, cyfluthrin 0.15% and etofenprox 0.5% were tested based on WHO method. Regression line was plotted for each insecticide using mortality of different exposure times. Bioassay data were analyzed using Probit software and the lethal time for 50% and 90% mortality (LT
resultsThe susceptibility levels of field strain of
conclusionOur findings indicated that
Indexed as
Identifiers
28032101PMC5186739What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.