ArticleJournal of arthropod-borne diseases2016
Serological and Molecular Detection of
Article in Journal of arthropod-borne diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- A meta-analysis onParasitology · 2025Review
- Evolution of dirofilariasis diagnostic techniques from traditional morphological analysis to molecular-based techniques: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in parasitology · 2024Review
- What Has Happened to Heartworm Disease in Europe in the Last 10 Years?Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Molecular characterization of canine filarioids in a previously non-endemic area of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil.Parasitology research · 2022Article
- First time identification of subconjunctival Dirofilaria immitis in Turkey: giant episcleral granuloma mimicking scleritis.Parasitology research · 2021Article
- Development of a multiplex qPCR-based approach for the diagnosis of Dirofilaria immitis, D. repens and Acanthocheilonema reconditum.Parasites & vectors · 2020Article
- Vector-borne nematode diseases in pets and humans in the Mediterranean Basin: An update.Veterinary world · 2019Review
- Dirofilaria repens in dogs and humans in Lithuania.Parasites & vectors · 2019Article
- Molecular Detection and Phylogenetic Analysis of EndosymbiontJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
methodsA total of 161 whole blood and sera samples were collected from stray dogs and stored at -20 °C until used. After DNA extraction, all samples were processed with
resultsThree of the examined dogs (1.8%) were found to be infected with only
conclusionAlthough dirofilariosis is not a serious problem in the region, the stray dogs still continue to be a source of infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28032096PMC5186734W2214221095What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.