ArticleFuture science OA2015
Injectable liposomal formulations of opiorphin as a new therapeutic strategy in pain management.
Article in Future science OA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Opiorphin and neuropathic pain: a promising treatment approach?Inflammopharmacology · 2025Review
- Delivery and adjuvant: liposomes for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.Biotechnologia · 2025Review
- Vesicle-based formulations for pain treatment: a narrative review.Pain reports · 2024Review
- A Novel Ophthalmic Solution Containing GlicoproJournal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- New Perspectives in the Pathophysiology and Treatment of Pain in Patients with Dry Eye Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Drug-Loaded Biocompatible Nanocarriers Embedded in Poloxamer 407 Hydrogels as Therapeutic Formulations.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Mucosal Applications of Poloxamer 407-Based Hydrogels: An Overview.Pharmaceutics · 2018Review
- Comparison of electroencephalographic changes in response to acute electrical and thermal stimuli with the tail flick and hot plate test in rats administered with opiorphin.BMC neurology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConventional and PEGylated liposomes were developed, aimed at improving the pain-killing effect of opiorphin.
methodsThe antinociceptive action of the formulations was investigated on rats (tail-flick test), and compared with that of opiorphin and morphine aqueous solutions (all at 5 mg/kg).
resultsOpiorphin loading in conventional liposomes enabled a 28% AUC increase with respect to free peptide. PEGylated liposomes provided AUC values 80, 60 and 40% higher than free peptide, morphine and opiorphin-loaded conventional liposomes, respectively. Moreover, opiorphin entrapment in PEGylated liposomes increased analgesic effect duration by more than 50%. These results were attributed to the greater effectiveness of PEGylated liposomes in protecting the drug and prolonging its circulation time.
conclusionOpiorphin-loaded PEGylated-liposomes can represent a valid alternative to morphine in pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.