Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28031862›Full record

ReviewFuture science OA2015

Nitric oxide for cancer therapy.

Sergio Huerta

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future science OA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Repurposing of the Drug Tezosentan for Cancer Therapy.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Antitumor Effects of L-citrulline on Hela Cervical Cancer Cell Lines.Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Article
  16. A Density Matrix Renormalization Group Study of the Low-Lying Excited States of a Molybdenum Carbonyl-Nitrosyl Complex.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sergio HuertaDepartment of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, VA North Texas Health Care System, 4500 S. Lancaster Rd./Surgical Services (112)/Dallas, TX 75216, USA.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resistance to current therapeutic interventions is a major challenge in the treatment of patients affected by cancer. While nitric oxide (NO) might have proneoplastic properties, it is now clear that at high doses, NO has a role in cancer therapeutics. Either as a single agent or in combination with other antineoplastic compounds, NO might be used to overcome tumor cell resistance to conventional treatments. The following discussion addresses the role of NO in cancer therapeutics and includes a report on the role of NO donors in the area of cancer therapeutics.

Indexed as

diazeniumdiolatesJSKNO donorsNO hybrids

Identifiers

PMID28031862
PMCPMC5137992
OpenAlexW2173659232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.