Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28031824›Full record

ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2016

Canine cancer immunotherapy studies: linking mouse and human.

Jiwon S Park, Sita S Withers, Jaime F Modiano, Michael S Kent, Mingyi Chen, Jesus I Luna, William T N Culp, Ellen E Sparger, Robert B Rebhun, Arta M Monjazeb and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. A New Method of Canine CD4International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiwon S Park *Department of Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA.
Sita S Withers *Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
Jaime F ModianoDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Cancer Care and Research Center, Center for Immunology, Masonic Cancer Center, and Stem Cell Institute, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108 USA.
Michael S KentThe Center for Companion Animal Health, Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Mingyi ChenDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA.
Jesus I LunaLaboratory of Cancer Immunology, Department of Dermatology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA.
William T N CulpThe Center for Companion Animal Health, Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Ellen E SpargerDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
Robert B RebhunThe Center for Companion Animal Health, Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Arta M MonjazebDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA.
William J MurphyDermatology and Internal Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA.
Robert J CanterDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA.
University of California Davis Medical Center · USCenter for Epidemiology and Animal Health · USUniversity of California, Davis · USStem Cell Institute · PA

Funding

Radio-immunotherapy to Target Cancer Stem Cells in Solid Tumor MalignanciesR01CA189209 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI MURPHY, WILLIAM JOSEPH · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
1 of 3 Interdisciplinary Collaboratory for Enhancing Translational Therapeutics Utilizing Biologically, Immunologically, and Metabollically Relevant Models of Breast CancerR01CA195904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI MURPHY, WILLIAM JOSEPH · 2015 to 2017
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA189209NCI NIH HHS R01 CA195904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent major clinical breakthroughs in human cancer immunotherapy including the use of checkpoint inhibitors and engineered T cells, important challenges remain, including determining the sub-populations of patients who will respond and who will experience at times significant toxicities. Although advances in cancer immunotherapy depend on preclinical testing, the majority of in-vivo testing currently relies on genetically identical inbred mouse models which, while offering critical insights regarding efficacy and mechanism of action, also vastly underrepresent the heterogeneity and complex interplay of human immune cells and cancers. Additionally, laboratory mice uncommonly develop spontaneous tumors, are housed under specific-pathogen free conditions which markedly impacts immune development, and incompletely model key aspects of the tumor/immune microenvironment. The canine model represents a powerful tool in cancer immunotherapy research as an important link between murine models and human clinical studies. Dogs represent an attractive outbred combination of companion animals that experience spontaneous cancer development in the setting of an intact immune system. This allows for study of complex immune interactions during the course of treatment while also directly addressing long-term efficacy and toxicity of cancer immunotherapies. However, immune dissection requires access to robust and validated immune assays and reagents as well as appropriate numbers for statistical evaluation. Canine studies will need further optimization of these important mechanistic tools for this model to fulfill its promise as a model for immunotherapy. This review aims to discuss the canine model in the context of existing preclinical cancer immunotherapy models to evaluate both its advantages and limitations, as well as highlighting its growth as a powerful tool in the burgeoning field of both human and veterinary immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Cancer immunotherapyCanine modelMurine modelOutbredSpontaneous cancer

Identifiers

PMID28031824
PMCPMC5171656
OpenAlexW2564241908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.