Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28031819›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2016

Genetic risk analysis of a patient with fulminant autoimmune type 1 diabetes mellitus secondary to combination ipilimumab and nivolumab immunotherapy.

Jared R Lowe, Daniel J Perry, April K S Salama, Clayton E Mathews, Larry G Moss, Brent A Hanks

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jared R LoweDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710 USA.
Daniel J PerryDepartment of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA.
April K S SalamaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Melanoma Program, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710 USA.
Clayton E MathewsDepartment of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA.
Larry G MossDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, & Nutrition, Duke University Medical Center, Duke Molecular Physiology Institute and Sarah W. Stedman Nutrition and Metabolism Center, Durham, NC 27701 USA.
Brent A HanksDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Melanoma Program, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710 USA.
Cancer Institute (WIA) · INUniversity of Florida · USDuke Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

Project 3P01AI042288 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Todd Michael Brusko · 1997 to 2026
$32.9M
Genetic Regulation of Human Beta Cell DestructionUC4DK104194 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MATHEWS, CLAYTON E · 2014 to 2014
$3.1M
mt-Nd2 and Resistance to Autoimmune DiabetesR01DK074656 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MATHEWS, CLAYTON E · 2006 to 2015
$2.8M
Melanoma-mediated Dendritic Cell Tolerization and Immune EvasionK08CA191063 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HANKS, BRENT ALLEN · 2015 to 2019
$826k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA191063NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI042288NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK074656NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK104194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCheckpoint inhibitor immunotherapy is becoming an effective treatment modality for an increasing number of malignancies. As a result, autoinflammatory side-effects are also being observed more commonly in the clinic. We are currently unable to predict which patients will develop more severe toxicities associated with these treatment regimens. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a patient with stage IV melanoma that developed rapid onset autoimmune type 1 diabetes (T1D) in response to combination ipilimumab and nivolumab immunotherapy. At the time of the patient's presentation with diabetes ketoacidosis, a confirmed anti-GAD antibody seroconversion was noted. Longer-term follow-up of this patient has demonstrated a durable complete response based on PET CT imaging along with a persistently undetectable C-peptide level. Single nucleotide polymorphism gene sequencing and HLA risk allele analysis has revealed the patient to lack any established genetic predisposition to the development of autoimmune T1D.

conclusionsWhile larger studies are necessary to better understand the role of genetic risk factors for the development of autoimmune toxicities in those patients undergoing checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy, these results suggest that pre-screening patients for known T1D risk alleles may not be indicated. Additional investigation is needed to determine whether an approach such as T cell receptor clonotypic analysis to identify the presence of autoreactive T cell clones may be an effective approach for predicting which patients are at risk for the development of autoinflammatory toxicities while undergoing checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Advanced melanomaAutoimmune endocrinopathyGenetic risk analysisHLA risk alleleIpilimumabNivolumabSingle nucleotide polymorphismType I diabetes

Identifiers

PMID28031819
PMCPMC5170902
OpenAlexW2558893427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.