ArticleEcology and evolution2016
Assessing polar bear (
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inferring Geographic Origin of White-Tailed Deer (Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Habitat Selection and Intrapopulation Spatial Segregation in an Arctic Top Predator at the Southern Limit of Its Range.Global change biology · 2026Article
- Patterns and temporal trends in canine breakage and scarring in Western Hudson Bay polar bears (Ursus maritimus).PloS one · 2025Article
- Empirical landscape genetic comparison of single nucleotide polymorphisms and microsatellites in three arid-zone mammals with high dispersal capacity.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Linking genetic, morphological, and behavioural divergence between inland island and mainland deer mice.Heredity · 2022Article
- Sea ice reduction drives genetic differentiation among Barents Sea polar bears.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Role of individual dispersal in genetic resilience in fluctuating populations of the gray-sided voleEcology and evolution · 2021Article
- The influence of a priori grouping on inference of genetic clusters: simulation study and literature review of the DAPC method.Heredity · 2020Review
- Canadian polar bear population structure using genome-wide markers.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Geographical assignment of polar bears using multi-element isoscapes.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Comparing Pool-seq, Rapture, and GBS genotyping for inferring weak population structure: The American lobster (Ecology and evolution · 2019Article
- Assessing polar bear (Ecology and evolution · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Defining subpopulations using genetics has traditionally used data from microsatellite markers to investigate population structure; however, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have emerged as a tool for detection of fine-scale structure. In Hudson Bay, Canada, three polar bear (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.