ArticleBioData mining2016
The Interaction Network Ontology-supported modeling and mining of complex interactions represented with multiple keywords in biomedical literature.
Article in BioData mining, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune biomarkers, profiles, and responses: a vaccine ontology perspective.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of GPT and BERT-based models on identifying proteinprotein interactions in biomedical text.ArXiv · 2023Article
- A comprehensive update on CIDO: the community-based coronavirus infectious disease ontology.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2022Article
- COVID-19 vaccine design using reverse and structural vaccinology, ontology-based literature mining and machine learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Precision omics data integration and analysis with interoperable ontologies and their application for COVID-19 research.Briefings in functional genomics · 2021Article
- Overview of the BioCreative VI Precision Medicine Track: mining protein interactions and mutations for precision medicine.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019Article
- BioCreative VI Precision Medicine Track system performance is constrained by entity recognition and variations in corpus characteristics.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018Article
- BIOSSES: a semantic sentence similarity estimation system for the biomedical domain.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- Ontology-based literature mining of E. coli vaccine-associated gene interaction networks.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Interaction Network Ontology (INO) logically represents biological interactions, pathways, and networks. INO has been demonstrated to be valuable in providing a set of structured ontological terms and associated keywords to support literature mining of gene-gene interactions from biomedical literature. However, previous work using INO focused on single keyword matching, while many interactions are represented with two or more interaction keywords used in combination.
methodsThis paper reports our extension of INO to include combinatory patterns of two or more literature mining keywords co-existing in one sentence to represent specific INO interaction classes. Such keyword combinations and related INO interaction type information could be automatically obtained via SPARQL queries, formatted in Excel format, and used in an INO-supported SciMiner, an in-house literature mining program. We studied the gene interaction sentences from the commonly used benchmark Learning Logic in Language (LLL) dataset and one internally generated vaccine-related dataset to identify and analyze interaction types containing multiple keywords. Patterns obtained from the dependency parse trees of the sentences were used to identify the interaction keywords that are related to each other and collectively represent an interaction type.
resultsThe INO ontology currently has 575 terms including 202 terms under the interaction branch. The relations between the INO interaction types and associated keywords are represented using the INO annotation relations: 'has literature mining keywords' and 'has keyword dependency pattern'. The keyword dependency patterns were generated via running the Stanford Parser to obtain dependency relation types. Out of the 107 interactions in the LLL dataset represented with two-keyword interaction types, 86 were identified by using the direct dependency relations. The LLL dataset contained 34 gene regulation interaction types, each of which associated with multiple keywords. A hierarchical display of these 34 interaction types and their ancestor terms in INO resulted in the identification of specific gene-gene interaction patterns from the LLL dataset. The phenomenon of having multi-keyword interaction types was also frequently observed in the vaccine dataset.
conclusionsBy modeling and representing multiple textual keywords for interaction types, the extended INO enabled the identification of complex biological gene-gene interactions represented with multiple keywords.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.