ArticleThe International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc2016
Reliability of Two Ankle-Brachial Index Methods to Predict Silent Lacunar Infarcts: A Population-Based Study in Stroke-Free Older Adults (the Atahualpa Project).
Article in The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alternative ankle-brachial assessments show no significant added value in predicting mortality of hypertensive patients.Journal of hypertension · 2026Article
- Associations between physical activity and ankle-brachial index: the Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS).BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals with an abnormal ankle-brachial index (ABI) are four times more likely to have a silent lacunar infarct (SLI), but reliability of ABI in predicting the presence of these lesions has not been estimated yet. We compared two methods of calculating ABI to assess their reliability in predicting SLIs. Stroke-free Atahualpa residents aged ≥ 60 years underwent MRI of the brain and ABI determinations. Persons with ABI ≥ 1.4 were excluded. Using receiver operator characteristic curve analysis, we calculated the reliability of the traditional as well as an alternative ABI method to identify individuals with SLI. The traditional ABI uses the higher systolic pressure of either the dorsalis pedis or the posterior tibial arteries as the numerator, whereas the alternative ABI uses the lower pressure. Of the 247 participants, 38 (15%) had traditional and 95 (38%) had alternative ABIs ≤ 0.9. Twenty-one individuals had SLI. Traditional and alternative ABIs ≤ 0.9 identified 9 and 13 individuals with SLI, respectively. The traditional ABI had sensitivity of 42.9% (22.6-65.6%) and specificity of 87.2% (81.9-91.1%). The alternative ABI had sensitivity of 61.9% (38.6-81%) and specificity of 63.7% (57-69.9%). The area under the curve for the predictive value of SLI was 0.65 (0.54-0.76) for the traditional and 0.63 (0.52-0.74) for the alternative ABI ≤ 0.9. The ABI is moderately reliable for identifying candidates for MRI screening in studies assessing the burden of SLI in older adults. The traditional ABI seems to be more suitable for this purpose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.