Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28031612›Full record

Trial reportIndian journal of pharmacology2016

Use of prelecture assignment to enhance learning in pharmacology lectures for the 2

Marya Ahsan, Ayaz Khurram Mallick

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Indian journal of pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marya AhsanDepartment of Pharmacology, Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ayaz Khurram MallickDepartment of Biochemistry, Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMajority of teaching hours allotted by the Medical Council of India in pharmacology are utilized in the form of didactic lecture. Although these lectures are an excellent tool to deliver the information to a large group of students, it usually ends up as a one-sided teaching session with most students being the passive listeners. To make these lectures interesting and effective, we introduced the students to prelecture assignment (PLA) in the form of clinical case before the delivery of the lecture.

methodsThis prospective educational trial was conducted in the Department of Pharmacology with undergraduate medical students in their 2

resultsFifty-six students from Group A and 42 from Group B appeared for the test. The students who were given PLA scored better. They felt more confident in answering and understood the topic better than the students of other group.

conclusionPLA is a useful teaching-learning tool. The pharmacology lectures are interactive, interesting, and easy to understand with this tool.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansIndiaLearningPharmacologyStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesAssignmentslecturesprelecture assignmentPre lecture assignment (PLA) can help in making pharmacology lectures interactive, thought provoking, interesting and easy to understand. PLAs give learners an opportunity to identify the misconceptions of the students and thus build the lecture around those key points instead of making the lecture a one-way traffic of information.undergraduate medical students

Identifiers

PMID28031612
PMCPMC5178060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.