Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28031487›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Comprehensive population-based genome sequencing provides insight into hematopoietic regulatory mechanisms.

Michael H Guo, Satish K Nandakumar, Jacob C Ulirsch, Seyedeh M Zekavat, Jason D Buenrostro, Pradeep Natarajan, Rany M Salem, Roberto Chiarle, Mario Mitt, Mart Kals and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. CRISPR-based strategies for studying regulatory elements and chromatin structure in mammalian gene control.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Michael H GuoBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Satish K NandakumarBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Jacob C UlirschBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Seyedeh M ZekavatBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Jason D BuenrostroBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Pradeep NatarajanBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Rany M SalemBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Roberto ChiarleDepartment of Pathology, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
Mario MittEstonian Genome Center, University of Tartu, Tartu 51010, Estonia.
Mart KalsEstonian Genome Center, University of Tartu, Tartu 51010, Estonia.
Kalle PärnEstonian Genome Center, University of Tartu, Tartu 51010, Estonia.
Krista FischerEstonian Genome Center, University of Tartu, Tartu 51010, Estonia.
Lili MilaniEstonian Genome Center, University of Tartu, Tartu 51010, Estonia.
Reedik MägiEstonian Genome Center, University of Tartu, Tartu 51010, Estonia.
Priit PaltaEstonian Genome Center, University of Tartu, Tartu 51010, Estonia.
Stacey B GabrielBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Andres MetspaluEstonian Genome Center, University of Tartu, Tartu 51010, Estonia.
Eric S LanderBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142; sankaran@broadinstitute.org lander@broadinstitute.org tesko@broadinstitute.org.
Sekar KathiresanBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Joel N HirschhornBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Tõnu EskoBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142; sankaran@broadinstitute.org lander@broadinstitute.org tesko@broadinstitute.org.
Vijay G SankaranBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142; sankaran@broadinstitute.org lander@broadinstitute.org tesko@broadinstitute.org.
University of Tartu · EEBroad Institute · USBoston Children's Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USCenter for Human Genetics · USCenter for Systems Biology · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

Cell Interactions in the Inflamed Intestinal MucosaR01DK075787 · NIDDK · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI JOEL N HIRSCHHORN · 2007 to 2026
$13.1M
Systematic Genetic Dissection of Human ErythropoiesisR01DK103794 · NIDDK · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Vijay Ganesh Sankaran · 2014 to 2026
$5.9M
Identifying Genome-wide Association Study-Nominated Regulators of ErythropoiesisR33HL120791 · NHLBI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI SANKARAN, VIJAY GANESH · 2016 to 2018
$1.7M
Methods for Genetic Association Analysis of Longitudinal and Multiple PhenotypesR00HL122515 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SALEM, RANY · 2017 to 2019
$732k
NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL122515NHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL120791NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK075787NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK103794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic variants affecting hematopoiesis can influence commonly measured blood cell traits. To identify factors that affect hematopoiesis, we performed association studies for blood cell traits in the population-based Estonian Biobank using high-coverage whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in 2,284 samples and SNP genotyping in an additional 14,904 samples. Using up to 7,134 samples with available phenotype data, our analyses identified 17 associations across 14 blood cell traits. Integration of WGS-based fine-mapping and complementary epigenomic datasets provided evidence for causal mechanisms at several loci, including at a previously undiscovered basophil count-associated locus near the master hematopoietic transcription factor CEBPA The fine-mapped variant at this basophil count association near CEBPA overlapped an enhancer active in common myeloid progenitors and influenced its activity. In situ perturbation of this enhancer by CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells demonstrated that it is necessary for and specifically regulates CEBPA expression during basophil differentiation. We additionally identified basophil count-associated variation at another more pleiotropic myeloid enhancer near GATA2, highlighting regulatory mechanisms for ordered expression of master hematopoietic regulators during lineage specification. Our study illustrates how population-based genetic studies can provide key insights into poorly understood cell differentiation processes of considerable physiologic relevance.

Indexed as

Base SequenceBasophilsCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding ProteinsCell DifferentiationCell LineageChromosome MappingDatabases, Nucleic AcidEnhancer Elements, GeneticEpigenesis, GeneticEstoniaFemaleGATA2 Transcription FactorGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenome-Wide Association StudyHematopoiesisHumansCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding ProteinsCEBPA protein, humanGATA2 protein, humanGATA2 Transcription FactorbasophilsCEBPAgenome sequencingGWAShematopoiesis

Identifiers

PMID28031487
PMCPMC5255587
OpenAlexW2952573679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.