Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28031400›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2017

Spinal cord direct current stimulation differentially modulates neuronal activity in the dorsal and ventral spinal cord.

Weiguo Song, John H Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Spinal cord representation of motor cortex plasticity reflects corticospinal tract LTP.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  12. The Regenerative Effect of Trans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation After Spinal Cord Injury: Mechanisms and Pathways Underlying the Effect.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Transneuronal Downregulation of the Premotor Cholinergic System After Corticospinal Tract Loss.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Weiguo SongDepartment of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, City University of New York School of Medicine, New York, New York; and.
John H MartinDepartment of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, City University of New York School of Medicine, New York, New York; and jmartin@ccny.cuny.edu.

Funding

Cellular/Molecular Basis of Development: Research CenterG12MD007603 · NIMHD · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI PEZZANO, MARK · 2012 to 2017
$11.5M
Lesion and Activity Dependent Corticospinal Tract PlasticityR01NS064004 · NINDS · RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK D/B/A RF CUNY - CUNY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI John H Martin · 2009 to 2026
$5.2M
NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007603NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS064004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord direct current stimulation (sDCS) has the potential for promoting motor function after injury through its modulatory actions on sensory processing, reflex functions, the motor cortex (M1) motor map, and motor output. Here we addressed systems-level mechanisms underlying sDCS neuromodulation of spinal circuits activated by M1 and peripheral forelimb electrical stimulation in anesthetized healthy rats. We determined the effects of cathodal and anodal sDCS (c- and a-sDCS) on local field potentials (LFP) and single-unit activity recorded at 32 sites simultaneously within the sixth cervical segment using a silicon multielectrode array. M1 stimulation produced distinctive dorsomedial and ventral LFP responses that showed polarity-dependent sDCS modulation. c-sDCS enhanced and a-sDCS depressed significantly ventral M1 responses; neither modulated dorsal responses significantly. Using evoked changes in β- and γ-oscillations to assay network function, c-sDCS enhanced and a-sDCS reduced oscillation power ventrally. c-sDCS increased and a-sDCS decreased background firing and firing synchrony of recorded pairs of single units. Peripheral stimulation produced a region-dependent response that showed polarity-dependent sDCS modulation. The dorsomedial LFP was unaffected by c-sDCS and weakly suppressed with a-sDCS. Peripheral-evoked unit responses showed limited polarity dependence. Our findings stress that ventral motor network behavior is enhanced by the neuromodulatory actions of c-sDCS. The combined actions of c-sDCS on M1-evoked neural responses and network behavior in the cervical spinal cord help explain the reported enhanced motor effects of this neuromodulation approach and inform the mechanisms of sDCS for promoting motor rehabilitation after spinal cord or brain injury.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAfferent PathwaysAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsBiophysicsBrain WavesEvoked Potentials, MotorMotor CortexNeuronsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySpectrum AnalysisSpinal CordSpinal Cord Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID28031400
PMCPMC5340879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.