ReviewGlobal health, science and practice2016
A Review of 10 Years of Vasectomy Programming and Research in Low-Resource Settings.
Review in Global health, science and practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Old Wine in a New Bottle: Rebounding Vasectomy Practice in Low-Middle-Income Country.Public health challenges · 2026Article
- Unexpected profiles in vasectomy demand during a national campaign in Bolivia: cross-sectional study and associations in age, number of children, and motivations for seeking vasectomy.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2026Article
- Vasectomy knowledge, attitudes, and intentions among men in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2026Article
- Scoping review of barriers and facilitators to vasectomy uptake in Pakistan: a call for gender-equitable family planning.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Permanent Contraception: Women's Desire for Their Spouse and Future Uptake.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2026Article
- The impact of male contraception on global sexual and reproductive health and rights.Contraception · 2025Review
- A Successful Multi-Component Program for Expanding Vasectomy Services by MSI Reproductive Choices Bolivia.Gates open research · 2025Article
- Promoting Male Involvement in Family Planning: Insights From the No-Scalpel Vasectomy Program of Davao City, Philippines.Global health, science and practice · 2024Article
- A baseline audit of post-vasectomy follow-up at three Cape Town district health facilities.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024Article
- Reassessing the level and implications of male involvement in family planning in Indonesia.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- Down But Not Out: Vasectomy Is Faring Poorly Almost Everywhere-We Can Do Better To Make It A True Method Option.Global health, science and practice · 2023Article
- Knowledge, Attitude and Associated Factors Towards Vasectomy Among Married Men in Arba Minch Town, Southern Ethiopia, 2021; A Cross-Sectional Study.Open access journal of contraception · 2023Article
- Role of financial incentives in family planning services in India: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Virile Infertile Men, and Other Representations of In/Fertile Hegemonic Masculinity in Fiction Television Series.The Journal of medical humanities · 2021Article
- Men's Knowledge of Vasectomy and Its Associated Factors in Debre Tabor Town, Northwest Ethiopia: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Open access journal of contraception · 2021Article
- Contraceptive Method Mix: Updates and Implications.Global health, science and practice · 2020Article
- What About Methods for Men? A Qualitative Analysis of Attitudes Toward Male Contraception in Burkina Faso and Uganda.International perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2020Article
- Access to sexual and reproductive health commodities in East and Southern Africa: a cross-country comparison of availability, affordability and stock-outs in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia.BMC public health · 2020Article
- Intention to use vasectomy and its associated factors among married men in Debre Tabor Town, North West Ethiopia, 2019.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vasectomy is a highly effective and safe contraceptive method for couples who want to stop childbearing, but only 2.4% of men around the world use this method. We conducted an extensive review of the vasectomy research literature and programmatic reports, published between April 2005 and April 2015, to synthesize barriers and facilitators to vasectomy adoption. Of the more than 230 documents initially retrieved in our search, we ultimately included 75 documents in our review and synthesized the findings according to the Supply-Enabling Environment-Demand (SEED) Programming Model. Regarding promoting demand for vasectomy services, we found there was a general lack of awareness about the method among both men and women, which often fueled erroneous assumptions about how vasectomy affects men. Several types of programmatic activities directly addressed knowledge gaps and negative misperceptions, including community-based and mass media communications, employer-based promotion, and group counseling. For supply of services, the lack of or inaccurate knowledge about vasectomy was also prevalent among providers, particularly among community-based health workers. Programmatic activities to improve service delivery included the use of evidence-based vasectomy techniques such as no-scalpel vasectomy, whole-site trainings, task shifting, cascade training, and mobile outreach. Finally, programmatic approaches to building a more enabling environment included engagement of governments and other community and religious leaders as well as campaigns with gender transformative messaging that countered common myths and encouraged men's positive engagement in family planning and reproductive health. In summary, a successful vasectomy program is comprised of the mutually reinforcing components of continual demand for services and access to and supply of well-trained providers. In addition, there is an underlying need for enabling policies within the cultural and gender environments that extend beyond vasectomy and include men not just as default partners of female family planning clients but as equal beneficiaries of family planning and reproductive health programs in their own right. Accelerating progress toward meaningful integration of vasectomy into a comprehensive contraceptive method mix is only possible when political and financial will are aligned and support the logistical and promotional activities of a male reproductive health agenda.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.