Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28031286›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2017

Safety huddles to proactively identify and address electronic health record safety.

Shailaja Menon, Hardeep Singh, Traber D Giardina, William L Rayburn, Brenda P Davis, Elise M Russo, Dean F Sittig

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01710293 (Automated Point-of-Care Surveillance of Outpatient Delays in Cancer Diagnosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01710293 nawithdrawnnot on this map

Automated Point-of-Care Surveillance of Outpatient Delays in Cancer Diagnosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2017 to 2017Enrolled0ConditionsLung Cancer, Bladder Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Hepatocellular CarcinomaArmsCommunication of Patients Lost to Follow-up to Providers
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Applying requisite imagination to safeguard electronic health record transitions.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Toward More Proactive Approaches to Safety in the Electronic Health Record Era.Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. CLUSTERING AND PRIORITIZING PATIENT SAFETY ISSUES DURING EHR IMPLEMENTATION AND UPGRADES IN HOSPITAL SETTINGS.Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare · 2017
    Article
  20. Engineering technology resilience through informatics safety science.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shailaja MenonHouston Veterans Affairs Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and the Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Hardeep SinghHouston Veterans Affairs Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and the Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Traber D GiardinaHouston Veterans Affairs Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and the Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
William L RayburnBaylor Scott and White, College Station, TX, USA.
Brenda P DavisBaylor Scott and White, College Station, TX, USA.
Elise M RussoHouston Veterans Affairs Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and the Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Dean F SittigUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Biomedical Informatics and UT-Memorial Hermann Center for Health Care Quality and Safety, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

AHRQ HHS R01 HS022087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMethods to identify and study safety risks of electronic health records (EHRs) are underdeveloped and largely depend on limited end-user reports. "Safety huddles" have been found useful in creating a sense of collective situational awareness that increases an organization's capacity to respond to safety concerns. We explored the use of safety huddles for identifying and learning about EHR-related safety concerns.

designData were obtained from daily safety huddle briefing notes recorded at a single midsized tertiary-care hospital in the United States over 1 year. Huddles were attended by key administrative, clinical, and information technology staff. We conducted a content analysis of huddle notes to identify what EHR-related safety concerns were discussed. We expanded a previously developed EHR-related error taxonomy to categorize types of EHR-related safety concerns recorded in the notes.

resultsOn review of daily huddle notes spanning 249 days, we identified 245 EHR-related safety concerns. For our analysis, we defined EHR technology to include a specific EHR functionality, an entire clinical software application, or the hardware system. Most concerns (41.6%) involved " EHR technology working incorrectly, " followed by 25.7% involving " EHR technology not working at all. " Concerns related to "EHR technology missing or absent" accounted for 16.7%, whereas 15.9% were linked to " user errors ."

conclusionsSafety huddles promoted discussion of several technology-related issues at the organization level and can serve as a promising technique to identify and address EHR-related safety concerns. Based on our findings, we recommend that health care organizations consider huddles as a strategy to promote understanding and improvement of EHR safety.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPatient SafetySafety ManagementHumansRetrospective StudiesSoftwareTertiary Care CentersUnited StatesWorkflowelectronic health recordshealth information technologypatient safetyrisk managementsafety huddlessafety reporting

Identifiers

PMID28031286
PMCPMC5391729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.