Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28031268›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology2017

Distinct Roles of Opioid and Dopamine Systems in Lateral Hypothalamic Intracranial Self-Stimulation.

Soichiro Ide, Takehiro Takahashi, Yukio Takamatsu, George R Uhl, Hiroaki Niki, Ichiro Sora, Kazutaka Ikeda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Effects of NOP-Related Ligands in Nonhuman Primates.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Soichiro IdeAddictive Substance Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Takehiro TakahashiAddictive Substance Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukio TakamatsuAddictive Substance Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan.
George R UhlBranch of Molecular Neurobiology, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Hiroaki NikiAddictive Substance Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Ichiro SoraAddictive Substance Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazutaka IkedaAddictive Substance Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan.
National Institute on Drug Abuse · USNew Mexico VA Health Care System · USTokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Opioid and dopamine systems play crucial roles in reward. Similarities and differences in the neural mechanisms of reward that are mediated by these 2 systems have remained largely unknown. Thus, in the present study, we investigated the differences in reward function in both µ-opioid receptor knockout mice and dopamine transporter knockout mice, important molecules in the opioid and dopamine systems. Methods: Mice were implanted with electrodes into the right lateral hypothalamus (l hour). Mice were then trained to put their muzzle into the hole in the head-dipping chamber for intracranial electrical stimulation, and the influences of gene knockout were assessed. Results: Significant differences are observed between opioid and dopamine systems in reward function. µ-Opioid receptor knockout mice exhibited enhanced intracranial electrical stimulation, which induced dopamine release. They also exhibited greater motility under conditions of "despair" in both the tail suspension test and water wheel test. In contrast, dopamine transporter knockout mice maintained intracranial electrical stimulation responding even when more active efforts were required to obtain the reward. Conclusions: The absence of µ-opioid receptor or dopamine transporter did not lead to the absence of intracranial electrical stimulation responsiveness but rather differentially altered it. The present results in µ-opioid receptor knockout mice are consistent with the suppressive involvement of µ-opioid receptors in both positive incentive motivation associated with intracranial electrical stimulation and negative incentive motivation associated with depressive states. In contrast, the results in dopamine transporter knockout mice are consistent with the involvement of dopamine transporters in positive incentive motivation, especially its persistence. Differences in intracranial electrical stimulation in µ-opioid receptor and dopamine transporter knockout mice underscore the multidimensional nature of reward.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnimalsBiophysicsDopamineDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsElectric StimulationHypothalamic Area, LateralMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutMotivationMotor ActivityReceptors, Opioid, muRewardSelf AdministrationTime FactorsAnalgesics, OpioidDopamineDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsReceptors, Opioid, mudopamine transporterICSSknockout mousereward functionµ-opioid receptor

Identifiers

PMID28031268
PMCPMC5417052
OpenAlexW2562749930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.