Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28031249›Full record

ArticleGenome research2017

Transcription factor assisted loading and enhancer dynamics dictate the hepatic fasting response.

Ido Goldstein, Songjoon Baek, Diego M Presman, Ville Paakinaho, Erin E Swinstead, Gordon L Hager

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ido GoldsteinLaboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, The National Cancer Institute, The National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Songjoon BaekLaboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, The National Cancer Institute, The National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Diego M PresmanLaboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, The National Cancer Institute, The National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Ville PaakinahoLaboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, The National Cancer Institute, The National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Erin E SwinsteadLaboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, The National Cancer Institute, The National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Gordon L HagerLaboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, The National Cancer Institute, The National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fasting elicits transcriptional programs in hepatocytes leading to glucose and ketone production. This transcriptional program is regulated by many transcription factors (TFs). To understand how this complex network regulates the metabolic response to fasting, we aimed at isolating the enhancers and TFs dictating it. Measuring chromatin accessibility revealed that fasting massively reorganizes liver chromatin, exposing numerous fasting-induced enhancers. By utilizing computational methods in combination with dissecting enhancer features and TF cistromes, we implicated four key TFs regulating the fasting response: glucocorticoid receptor (GR), cAMP responsive element binding protein 1 (CREB1), peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPARA), and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta (CEBPB). These TFs regulate fuel production by two distinctly operating modules, each controlling a separate metabolic pathway. The gluconeogenic module operates through assisted loading, whereby GR doubles the number of sites occupied by CREB1 as well as enhances CREB1 binding intensity and increases accessibility of CREB1 binding sites. Importantly, this GR-assisted CREB1 binding was enhancer-selective and did not affect all CREB1-bound enhancers. Single-molecule tracking revealed that GR increases the number and DNA residence time of a portion of chromatin-bound CREB1 molecules. These events collectively result in rapid synergistic gene expression and higher hepatic glucose production. Conversely, the ketogenic module operates via a GR-induced TF cascade, whereby PPARA levels are increased following GR activation, facilitating gradual enhancer maturation next to PPARA target genes and delayed ketogenic gene expression. Our findings reveal a complex network of enhancers and TFs that dynamically cooperate to restore homeostasis upon fasting.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticAnimalsBinding SitesCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Protein-betaChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyCyclic AMP Response Element-Binding ProteinFastingGlucoseHepatocytesKetonesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPPAR alphaReceptors, GlucocorticoidCCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Protein-betaCebpb protein, mouseChromatinCreb1 protein, mouseCyclic AMP Response Element-Binding ProteinGlucoseKetonesPPAR alphaReceptors, Glucocorticoid

Identifiers

PMID28031249
PMCPMC5340970
OpenAlexW2566710076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.