Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28031185›Full record

SynthesisBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

MetaDCN: meta-analysis framework for differential co-expression network detection with an application in breast cancer.

Li Zhu, Ying Ding, Cho-Yi Chen, Lin Wang, Zhiguang Huo, SungHwan Kim, Christos Sotiriou, Steffi Oesterreich, George C Tseng

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Integrating network analysis and machine learning to elucidate chemical-induced pancreatic toxicity in zebrafish embryos.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Li ZhuDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Ying DingDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Cho-Yi ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Lin WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Zhiguang HuoDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
SungHwan KimDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Christos SotiriouBreast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, J. C. Heuson, Institut Jules Bordet, University Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels 1000, Belgium.
Steffi OesterreichMagee-Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
George C TsengDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.

Funding

Power calculation and design issues in next-generation sequencingR01CA190766 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TSENG, GEORGE C. · 2015 to 2018
$876k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationGene co-expression network analysis from transcriptomic studies can elucidate gene-gene interactions and regulatory mechanisms. Differential co-expression analysis helps further detect alterations of regulatory activities in case/control comparison. Co-expression networks estimated from single transcriptomic study is often unstable and not generalizable due to cohort bias and limited sample size. With the rapid accumulation of publicly available transcriptomic studies, co-expression analysis combining multiple transcriptomic studies can provide more accurate and robust results.

resultsIn this paper, we propose a meta-analytic framework for detecting differentially co-expressed networks (MetaDCN). Differentially co-expressed seed modules are first detected by optimizing an energy function via simulated annealing. Basic modules sharing common pathways are merged into pathway-centric supermodules and a Cytoscape plug-in (MetaDCNExplorer) is developed to visualize and explore the findings. We applied MetaDCN to two breast cancer applications: ER+/ER- comparison using five training and three testing studies, and ILC/IDC comparison with two training and two testing studies. We identified 20 and 4 supermodules for ER+/ER- and ILC/IDC comparisons, respectively. Ranking atop are 'immune response pathway' and 'complement cascades pathway' for ER comparison, and 'extracellular matrix pathway' for ILC/IDC comparison. Without the need for prior information, the results from MetaDCN confirm existing as well as discover novel disease mechanisms in a systems manner. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: R package 'MetaDCN' and Cytoscape App 'MetaDCNExplorer' are available at http://tsenglab.biostat.pitt.edu/software.htm . CONTACT: ctseng@pitt.edu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksBreast NeoplasmsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, NeoplasmHumansReceptors, EstrogenSample SizeReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID28031185
PMCPMC6041767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.