ArticleHealth research policy and systems2016
Building health research systems: WHO is generating global perspectives, and who's celebrating national successes?
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing evidence-informed policy: outcomes of the global research agenda on knowledge translation.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- [Health research in Honduras: a decade of transformations, challenges, and sustainable institutional strengtheningPesquisa em saúde em Honduras: uma década de transformações, desafios e fortalecimento institucional sustentável].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025Article
- Article
- How to strengthen a health research system: WHO's review, whose literature and who is providing leadership?Health research policy and systems · 2020Article
- Governance of health research funding institutions: an integrated conceptual framework and actionable functions of governance.Health research policy and systems · 2020Article
- A systems approach for optimizing implementation to impact: meeting report and proceedings of the 2019BMC proceedings · 2020Article
- 'All the stars were aligned'? The origins of England's National Institute for Health Research.Health research policy and systems · 2019Article
- Health research systems in change: the case of 'Push the Pace' in the National Institute for Health Research.Health research policy and systems · 2019Article
- The Palestinian health research system: who orchestrates the system, how and based on what? A qualitative assessment.Health research policy and systems · 2018Article
- Assessing policy-makers', academics' and experts' satisfaction with the performance of the Palestinian health research system: a qualitative study.Health research policy and systems · 2018Article
- A call for action to establish a research agenda for building a future health workforce in Europe.Health research policy and systems · 2018Article
- Understanding the concept and importance of the health research system in Palestine: a qualitative study.Health research policy and systems · 2018Article
- Maximising value from a United Kingdom Biomedical Research Centre: study protocol.Health research policy and systems · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2016, England's National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) celebrated its tenth anniversary as an innovative national health research system with a focus on meeting patients' needs. This provides a good opportunity to reflect on how the creation of the NIHR has greatly enhanced important work, started in 1991, to develop a health research system in England that is embedded in the National Health Service.In 2004, WHO identified a range of functions that a national health research system should undertake to improve the health of populations. Health Research Policy and Systems (HRPS) has taken particular interest in the pioneering developments in the English health research system, where the comprehensive approach has covered most, if not all, of the functions identified by WHO. Furthermore, several significant recent developments in thinking about health research are relevant for the NIHR and have informed accounts of its achievements. These include recognition of the need to combat waste in health research, which had been identified as a global problem in successive papers in the Lancet, and an increasing emphasis on demonstrating impact. Here, pioneering evaluation of United Kingdom research, conducted through the impact case studies of the Research Excellence Framework, is particularly important. Analyses informed by these and other approaches identified many aspects of NIHR's progress in combating waste, building and sustaining research capacity, creating centres of research excellence linked to leading healthcare institutions, developing research networks, involving patients and others in identifying research needs, and producing and adopting research findings that are improving health outcomes.The NIHR's overall success, and an analysis of the remaining problems, might have lessons for other systems, notwithstanding important advances in many countries, as described in papers in HRPS and elsewhere. WHO's recently established Global Observatory for Health Research and Development provides an opportunity to promote some of these lessons. To inform its work, the Observatory is sponsoring a thematic series of papers in HRPS focusing on health research issues such as funding flows, priority setting, capacity building, utilisation and equity. While important papers on these have been published, this series is still open to new submissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.