SynthesisImplementation science : IS2016
Enablers and barriers to implementing collaborative care for anxiety and depression: a systematic qualitative review.
Synthesis in Implementation science : IS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
80 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Facilitators and barriers to the sustainability of universally accessible parental training interventions: a systematic qualitative review using normalization process theory.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Supporting translation of research evidence into practice-the use of Normalisation Process Theory to assess and inform implementation within randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2023Pooled it
- Factors perceived by health professionals to be barriers or facilitators to caries prevention in children: a systematic review.BMC oral health · 2023Pooled it
- Understanding Barriers to and Facilitators of Case Management in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.Annals of family medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Cost Savings from Integrating Behavioral Health in Primary Care: A Pragmatic Randomized Control Trial with Karen Refugees.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2026Trial
- Disparities in the Treatment Engagement Cascade of Collaborative Care for Depression in a Pragmatic Implementation Study.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Trial
- "I Felt Like I Mattered": Caring is a key ingredient of collaborative care for chronic illness.Chronic illness · 2024Trial
- Primary care patients' experiences of video consultations for depression and anxiety: a qualitative interview study embedded in a randomized feasibility trial.BMC health services research · 2023Trial
- The care manager meeting the patients' unique needs using the care manager model-A qualitative study of experienced care managers.BMC family practice · 2021Trial
- How do care providers evaluate collaboration? - qualitative process evaluation of a cluster-randomized controlled trial of collaborative and stepped care for patients with mental disorders.BMC psychiatry · 2021Trial
- Collaborative care for mental health: a qualitative study of the experiences of patients and health professionals.BMC health services research · 2020Trial
- Implementation of care managers for patients with depression: a cross-sectional study in Swedish primary care.BMJ open · 2020Trial
- Process evaluation of a cluster randomised intervention in Swedish primary care: using care managers in collaborative care to improve care quality for patients with depression.BMC family practice · 2019Trial
- Refining a model of collaborative care for people with a diagnosis of bipolar, schizophrenia or other psychoses in England: a qualitative formative evaluation.BMC psychiatry · 2019Trial
- Organisational and social work-environment experiences after care manager implementation: a repeated cross-sectional study in Swedish primary care.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Development, Feasibility, and Appreciation of the Collaborative Integrated Depression Care (IDECA) Project in Flanders, Belgium.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Primary Care Physicians' Experiences with Integrated Mental Health Specialist Video Consultations-A Normalization Process Theory-Based Mixed-Methods Evaluation.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Developing the Link-me+EMPHN Mental Health Model of Care to Improve General Practitioner Capacity for Mental Health Care in Australian Primary Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Formative Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Primary care and community interventions for multimorbidity involving depression or anxiety: systematic review with meta-analysis.BMJ medicine · 2026Article
- Community-based Collaborative Care for Serious Mental Illness: A Rapid Qualitative Evidence Synthesis of Health Care Providers' Experiences and Perspectives.Community mental health journal · 2025Review
20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCollaborative care is an increasingly popular approach for improving quality of care for people with mental health problems through an intensified and structured collaboration between primary care providers and health professionals with specialized psychiatric expertise. Trials have shown significant positive effects for patients suffering from depression, but since collaborative care is a complex intervention, it is important to understand the factors which affect its implementation. We present a qualitative systematic review of the enablers and barriers to implementing collaborative care for patients with anxiety and depression.
methodsWe developed a comprehensive search strategy in cooperation with a research librarian and performed a search in five databases (EMBASE, PubMed, PsycINFO, ProQuest, and CINAHL). All authors independently screened titles and abstracts and reviewed full-text articles. Studies were included if they were published in English and based on the original qualitative data on the implementation of a collaborative care intervention targeted at depression or anxiety in an adult patient population in a high-income country. Our subsequent analysis employed the normalization process theory (NPT).
resultsWe included 17 studies in our review of which 11 were conducted in the USA, five in the UK, and one in Canada. We identified several barriers and enablers within the four major analytical dimensions of NPT. Securing buy-in among primary care providers was found to be critical but sometimes difficult. Enablers included physician champions, reimbursement for extra work, and feedback on the effectiveness of collaborative care. The social and professional skills of the care managers seemed critical for integrating collaborative care in the primary health care clinic. Day-to-day implementation was also found to be facilitated by the care managers being located in the clinic since this supports regular face-to-face interactions between physicians and care managers.
conclusionsThe following areas require special attention when planning collaborative care interventions: effective educational programs, especially for care managers; issues of reimbursement in relation to primary care providers; good systems for communication and monitoring; and promoting face-to-face interaction between care managers and physicians, preferably through co-location. There is a need for well-sampled, in-depth qualitative studies on the implementation of collaborative care in settings outside the USA and the UK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.