Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28030862›Full record

ArticleDigestion2016

A Comparative Study of a New Class of Gastric Acid Suppressant Agent Named Vonoparazan versus Esomeprazole for the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

Masahiro Tsujimae, Hiroshi Yamashita, Hiroki Hashimura, Chise Kano, Keiko Shimoyama, Atsushi Kanamori, Kei Matsumoto, Akio Koizumi, Kenji Momose, Takaaki Eguchi and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Digestion, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. The Aging Stomach: Clinical Implications ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Focusing onFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Potential Benefits of Vonoprazan asPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  13. Efficacy of Vonoprazan for Helicobacter pylori Eradication.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Role of Vonoprazan inFrontiers in pharmacology · 2018
    Review
  20. Clinical & experimental neuroimmunology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masahiro TsujimaeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroshi Yamashita
Hiroki Hashimura
Chise Kano
Keiko Shimoyama
Atsushi Kanamori
Kei Matsumoto
Akio Koizumi
Kenji Momose
Takaaki Eguchi
Takumi Fukuchi
Mikio Fujita
Akihiko Okada
Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHelicobacter pylori eradication rates have decreased worldwide. Gastric acid inhibition during treatment is important to eradicate these bacteria successfully. A new potassium-competitive acid blocker, vonoprazan (VPZ), has been shown to achieve high eradication rates in a previous randomized controlled trial.

objectiveTo determine the efficacy of VPZ for H. pylori eradication.

methodsA total of 874 patients were enrolled; 431 received esomeprazole (EPZ) and 443 received VPZ. First-line regimens contained clarithromycin (CAM) 200 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 750 mg b.i.d., and either EPZ 20 mg b.i.d. or VPZ 20 mg b.i.d. for 7 days. Metronidazole 250 mg b.i.d. replaced CAM in the second-line regimens. The eradication of H. pylori was assessed by 13C-urea breath tests 4-8 weeks after each therapy.

resultsThe overall first-line eradication rate was 79.9% (341/427) with EPZ vs. 86.3% (377/439) with VPZ (p = 0.019). The second-line eradication rate was 83.3% (45/51) with EPZ vs. 91.1% (41/45) with VPZ (p = 0.900).

conclusionVPZ was significantly more effective than EPZ for first-line treatment. However, for second-line treatment, there was no significant difference between EPZ and VPZ.

Indexed as

AgedAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Ulcer AgentsBreath TestsClarithromycinDisease EradicationDrug Therapy, CombinationEsomeprazoleFemaleHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansJapanMaleMetronidazole1-(5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl)-N-methylmethanamineAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Ulcer AgentsClarithromycinEsomeprazoleMetronidazoleProton Pump InhibitorsPyrrolesSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID28030862
PMCPMC5348727
OpenAlexW2565969148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.