Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28030621›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2016

HIV Clinical Pathway: A New Approach to Combine Guidelines and Sustainability of Anti-Retroviral Treatment in Italy.

Davide Croce, Adriano Lazzarin, Giuliano Rizzardini, Nicola Gianotti, Francesca Scolari, Emanuela Foglia, Elisabetta Garagiola, Elena Ricci, Teresa Bini, Tiziana Quirino and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. HTA and HIV: The Case of Dual NRTI Backbones in the Italian Setting.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  4. Global & regional health technology assessment
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Davide CroceCentre for Research in Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, LIUC-Università Cattaneo, Varese, Italy.
Adriano LazzarinClinic of Infectious Diseases, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giuliano RizzardiniDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Fatebebefratelli Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Nicola GianottiClinic of Infectious Diseases, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Francesca ScolariCentre for Research in Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, LIUC-Università Cattaneo, Varese, Italy.
Emanuela FogliaCentre for Research in Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, LIUC-Università Cattaneo, Varese, Italy.
Elisabetta GaragiolaCentre for Research in Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, LIUC-Università Cattaneo, Varese, Italy.
Elena RicciDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Fatebebefratelli Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Teresa BiniUnit of Infectious Diseases, Santi Paolo e Carlo Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Tiziana QuirinoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Valle Olona Hospital, Busto Arsizio, Italy.
Paolo ViganòDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Ovest Milanese Hospital, Legnano, Italy.
Tiziana ReDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Ovest Milanese Hospital, Legnano, Italy.
Antonella D'Arminio MonforteUnit of Infectious Diseases, Santi Paolo e Carlo Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Paolo BonfantiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Lecco Hospital, Lecco, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present article describes the case study of a "real world" HIV practice within the debate concerning the strategic role of Clinical Governance (CG) tools in the management of a National Healthcare System's sustainability. The study aimed at assessing the impact of a Clinical Pathway (CP) implementation, required by the Regional Healthcare Service, in terms of effectiveness (virological and immunological conditions) and efficiency (economic resources absorption), from the budget holder perspective. Data derived from a multi-centre cohort of patients treated in 6 Hospitals that provided care to approximately 42% of the total HIV+ patients, in Lombardy Region, Italy. Two phases were compared: Pre-CP (2009-2010) vs. Post-CP implementation (2011-2012). All HIV infected adults, observed in the participating hospitals during the study periods, were enrolled and stratified into the 3 categories defined by the Regional CP: first-line, switch for toxicity/other, and switch for failure. The study population was composed of 1,284 patients (Pre-CP phase) and 1,135 patients (Post-CP phase). The results showed that the same level of virological and immunological effectiveness was guaranteed to HIV+ patients: 81.2% of Pre-CP phase population and 83.2% of Post-CP phase population had undetectable HIV-RNA (defined as <50 copies/mL) at 12-month follow up. CD4+ cell counts increased by 28 ± 4 cells/mm3 in Pre-CP Phase and 39 ± 5 cells/mm3 in Post-CP Phase. From an economic point of view, the CP implementation led to a substantial advantage: the mean total costs related to the management of the HIV disease (ART, hospital admission and laboratory tests) decreased (-8.60%) in the Post-CP phase (p-value < 0.0001). Results confirmed that the CP provided appropriateness and quality of care, with a cost reduction for the budget holder.

Indexed as

Critical PathwaysGuidelines as TopicHealth Plan ImplementationPatient ComplianceAdultAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRNA, ViralViral LoadAnti-HIV AgentsRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID28030621
PMCPMC5193418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.