Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28030597›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

ENOblock Does Not Inhibit the Activity of the Glycolytic Enzyme Enolase.

Nikunj Satani, Yu-Hsi Lin, Naima Hammoudi, Sudhir Raghavan, Dimitra K Georgiou, Florian L Muller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Enolase-1 and Inflammation.Biomolecules · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. ENO1 and Cancer.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Targeting Host Glycolysis as a Strategy for Antimalarial Development.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nikunj SataniDepartment of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, TX, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3908-3731
Yu-Hsi LinDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Naima HammoudiDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Sudhir RaghavanDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Dimitra K GeorgiouDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Florian L MullerDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tropism Enhanced Oncolytic Adenovirus for the Treatment of Brain TumorsP50CA127001 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Juan Fueyo · 2008 to 2026
$41.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA127001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibition of glycolysis is of great potential for the treatment of cancer. However, inhibitors of glycolytic enzymes with favorable pharmacological profiles have not been forthcoming. Due to the nature of their active sites, most high-affinity transition-state analogue inhibitors of glycolysis enzymes are highly polar with poor cell permeability. A recent publication reported a novel, non-active site inhibitor of the glycolytic enzyme Enolase, termed ENOblock (N-[2-[2-2-aminoethoxy)ethoxy]ethyl]4-4-cyclohexylmethyl)amino]6-4-fluorophenyl)methyl]amino]1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]benzeneacetamide). This would present a major advance, as this is heterocyclic and fully cell permeable molecule. Here, we present evidence that ENOblock does not inhibit Enolase enzymatic activity in vitro as measured by three different assays, including a novel 31P NMR based method which avoids complications associated with optical interferences in the UV range. Indeed, we note that due to strong UV absorbance, ENOblock interferes with the direct spectrophotometric detection of the product of Enolase, phosphoenolpyruvate. Unlike established Enolase inhibitors, ENOblock does not show selective toxicity to ENO1-deleted glioma cells in culture. While our data do not dispute the biological effects previously attributed to ENOblock, they indicate that such effects must be caused by mechanisms other than direct inhibition of Enolase enzymatic activity.

Indexed as

GlycolysisBenzamidesCell Line, TumorHumansPhosphopyruvate HydrataseTriazinesBenzamidesENOblockPhosphopyruvate HydrataseTriazines

Identifiers

PMID28030597
PMCPMC5193436
OpenAlexW2569706514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.