Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28030423›Full record

ArticleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2017

Unique Educational Opportunities for PCPs and Specialists Arising From Electronic Consultation Services.

Erin J Keely, Douglas Archibald, Delphine S Tuot, Heather Lochnan, Clare Liddy

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Electronic consultations and clinician burnout: An antidote to our emotional pandemic?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erin J KeelyE.J. Keely is full professor, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, and chief, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, and specialist lead, Champlain BASE eConsult Service.D. Archibald is assistant professor, Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, and education researcher, C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.D.S. Tuot is assistant professor, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco; Division of Nephrology, San Francisco General Hospital; and director, San Francisco General Hospital eReferral program and University of California, San Francisco, Center for Innovation in Access and Quality, San Francisco, California.H. Lochnan is associate professor, Department of Medicine, and assistant dean, Continuing Professional Development and Education Programming, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.C. Liddy is associate professor, Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, clinician investigator, C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, and primary care lead, Champlain BASE eConsult Service.
Douglas Archibald
Delphine S Tuot
Heather Lochnan
Clare Liddy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health care reform should be driven by the goals of better patient experience, improved population health, lower per capita costs, and improved provider satisfaction. Electronic consultation (eConsult) services have been adopted by several jurisdictions in the United States, Canada, and Europe to improve access to specialists by primary care providers (PCPs) and are being heralded as a key component for delivery of coordinated care. The primary intent of an eConsult service is to provide PCPs with efficient, timely, direct access to specialist expertise to help guide the management of their patients, reduce the need for unnecessary face-to-face specialty consultations, and improve the quality of the initial face-to-face consultation when needed, through the preconsultative communication.In addition to improving access to care, eConsult services have been praised by PCPs and specialists for their educational value, in particular their ability to enrich practice-based learning. Less recognized, but equally important from the educational perspective, include the abilities of eConsult programs to promote reflection by PCPs and specialists, improve collegiality and professionalism between primary and specialist care, inform continuing professional development activities and maintenance of certification, and enhance training programs' teaching of effective communication and care coordination.As eConsult services become increasingly available, the medical community must leverage the educational opportunities inherent in eConsult programs to further improve the delivery of coordinated specialty care. The educational role of eConsults should be considered as a priority outcome in their evaluation and must be highlighted and optimized in next iterations of eConsult systems design.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareSpecializationCommunicationHumansMedicineReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.