Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28029712›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2017

Caregiver, patient, and nurse visit communication patterns in cancer home hospice.

Maija Reblin, Margaret F Clayton, Jiayun Xu, Jennifer M Hulett, Seth Latimer, Gary W Donaldson, Lee Ellington

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maija ReblinDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3108-465X
Margaret F ClaytonCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jiayun XuCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jennifer M HulettCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Seth LatimerCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Gary W DonaldsonPain Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Lee EllingtonCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

Symptom Care by Phone for Hospice Caregiver Support and Cancer Symptom ReliefP01CA138317 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MOONEY, KATHLEEN H · 2010 to 2015
$7.0M
Interdisciplinary Training in Cancer, Caregiving and End-of-Life CareT32NR013456 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ELLINGTON, LEE A, MOONEY, KATHLEEN H · 2013 to 2022
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA138317NINR NIH HHS T32 NR013456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFew studies have examined the triadic communication between patients, spouse caregivers, and nurses in the home hospice setting. Thus, little is known about the types of communication patterns that unfold. The goals of the study were to, first, identify common patterns of communication in nurse-patient-caregiver home hospice visits and, second, to identify nurse, caregiver-patient dyad, and visit characteristics that predict visit communication patterns.

methodNurses (N = 58) and hospice cancer patient and spouse caregiver dyads (N = 101; 202 individuals) were recruited from 10 hospice agencies. Nurses audio recorded visits to patient/caregiver homes from study enrollment until patient death. All patient, caregiver, and nurse utterances from the audio recordings were coded using an adapted Roter interaction analysis system. Using identified codes, cluster analysis was conducted to identify communication patterns within hospice visits. Logistic regression was used with demographic variables to predict visit communication patterns.

resultsSix visit communication patterns were identified and were defined largely by 2 dimensions: (1) either the patient, the caregiver, or the patient and caregiver dyad interacting with the nurse and (2) the relatively high or low expression of distress during the visit. Time until death significantly predicted several clusters.

conclusionThis study leads the way in outlining triadic communication patterns in cancer home hospice visits. Our findings have implications for nursing education, letting future nurses know what to expect, and lays the foundation for future research to determine effectiveness and interventions to improve health care communication.

Indexed as

CommunicationNurse-Patient RelationsAdultAgedCaregiversFemaleHospice and Palliative Care NursingHospice CareHumansLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsStress, Psychologicalcancercaregiverhealth communicationhome hospicelongitudinal research

Identifiers

PMID28029712
PMCPMC5489378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.