Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28028920›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2017

The influence of substrate modulus on retinal pigment epithelial cells.

Corina White, Tyler DiStefano, Ronke Olabisi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Long-term cultivation of retinal pigment epithelium cells on nanofiber scaffolds.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nano-Biomaterials for Retinal Regeneration.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Tissue Engineering Strategies for Retina Regeneration.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Corina WhiteBiomedical Engineering, The State University of New Jersey, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey.
Tyler DiStefanoNeurobiology, Neurodegeneration, and Repair, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Ronke OlabisiBiomedical Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USNational Eye Institute · US

Funding

UMDNJ TRAINING GRANT IN BIOTECHNOLOGYT32GM008339 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI YARMUSH, MARTIN L · 1989 to 2019
$6.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although transplantation of retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells has shown promise for the treatment of retinal degenerative diseases, this therapeutic approach is not without challenges. Two major challenges are RPE cell dedifferentiation and inflammatory response following transplantation. The aim of this work is to understand how the rigidity of a scaffold, a relatively unexplored design aspect in retinal tissue engineering, affects RPE cells, particularly the pathways associated with the aforementioned challenges. Poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) of varying molecular weights from 3.4 to 20 kDa were photopolymerized to fabricate scaffolds. The Young's modulus of the scaffolds varied from 60 to 1200 kPa. A cell study was then conducted to test the effects of scaffold rigidity on RPE cells. A cell adhesion peptide motif of arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-serine (RGDS) was conjugated to 60 and 1200 kPa scaffolds and ARPE-19 cells, a human RPE cell line, were seeded onto these hydrogels. Cells grown on scaffolds demonstrated qualitatively different adhesion properties, metabolic activity, and gene expression at an mRNA level. IL-6 and MCP-1, two inflammation markers known to recruit microglial into the retina, had the same expression pattern with cells having the highest expression on the high modulus scaffold and lowest expression on the control substrate. This study demonstrates that scaffold rigidity, an important design parameter in other areas of tissue engineering, affects cell adhesion, activity, and expression of RPE cells. Though more exploration is needed, this begins to lay a foundation for optimizing scaffold rigidity to promote long-term success of RPE scaffolds. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 105A: 1260-1266, 2017.

Indexed as

Elastic ModulusMaterials TestingCell LineChemokine CCL2HumansInterleukin-6OligopeptidesPolyethylene GlycolsRetinal Pigment EpitheliumTissue Scaffoldsarginyl-glycyl-aspartyl-serineCCL2 protein, humanChemokine CCL2IL6 protein, humanInterleukin-6OligopeptidesPolyethylene GlycolsBruch's membranemodulusretinal pigment epithelium

Identifiers

PMID28028920
PMCPMC6519294
OpenAlexW2565793023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.