ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2018
An Alternative Method for Screening Gastric Cancer Based on Serum Levels of CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a novel blood-based biomarker for gastric cancer triage in chronic dyspepsia.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Identification of necrosis-related signature for predicting prognosis and immunotherapy response in gastric cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- The value of circulating methylated septin 9 in the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of gastric cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Identification and potential mechanism of a novel gastric cancer suppressor tRF-24-6VR8K09LE9.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Values of HIF1A-AS2 and LINC00511 in Gastric Cancer withCancer management and research · 2025Article
- Deciphering the Landscape of GATA-Mediated Transcriptional Regulation in Gastric Cancer.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Gastric Cancer: An Up-to-Date Review with New Insights into Early-Onset Gastric Cancer.Cancers · 2024Review
- The ASH1L-AS1-ASH1L axis controls NME1-mediated activation of the RAS signaling in gastric cancer.Oncogene · 2023Article
- Novel prognostic indicator combining inflammatory indicators and tumor markers for gastric cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Novel Drug Delivery Systems as an Emerging Platform for Stomach Cancer Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Article
- Diagnostic value of combined detection of CA72-4, CA19-9, and carcinoembryonic antigen comparing to CA72-4 alone in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2022Article
- Differential Long Non-Coding RNA Expression Analysis in Chronic Non-Atrophic Gastritis, Gastric Mucosal Intraepithelial Neoplasia, and Gastric Cancer Tissues.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Long non-coding RNA B3GALT5-AS1 contributes to the progression of gastric cancer via interacting with CSNK2A1.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
- Clinical Value of Combined Detection of Serum sTim-3 and Pepsinogen for Gastric Cancer Diagnosis.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Aberrant Non-Coding RNA Expressed in Gastric Cancer and Its Diagnostic Value.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Combining Serum DNA Methylation Biomarkers and Protein Tumor Markers Improved Clinical Sensitivity for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer.International journal of genomics · 2021Article
- Gastric Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification, Genomic Characteristics and Treatment Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Long non-coding RNAs towards precision medicine in gastric cancer: early diagnosis, treatment, and drug resistance.Molecular cancer · 2020Review
- A Predictive Scoring System Based on Inflammatory and Tumor Markers for Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Curative Resection.Cancer management and research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe goal of this study was to create a novel method for screening gastric cancer (GC) based on serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and cancer antigen 72-4 (CA72-4) tumor markers.
methodsRetrospectively, the predictive value for GC was calculated using a logistic analysis on serum levels of CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4 from 216 GC and 49 benign patients. The predictive value was used to make a recommendation system on whether further GC screening was necessary. Prospectively, 80 GC and 33 benign patients were used to assess the value of this method.
resultsThe recommendation system to determine whether additional GC screening was necessary consisted of three grades: grade I, no proposals; grade II, proposals; grade III, strong proposals. Additional screening was suggested when the predictive value was ≤0.700 (grade I), 0.700-0.850 (grade II), and >0.850 (grade III). Of the total 216 GC patients, 20.4, 27.8, and 51.9% were classified as grades I, II, and III, respectively. Of the 49 benign cases, 57.1, 32.7, and 10.2% were classified as grades I, II, and III, respectively. Of the 80 prospective GC patients, 17.3, 28.4, and 54.3% were classified as grades I, II, and III, respectively. Of the 33 prospective benign cases, 54.6, 33.3, and 12.1% were classified as grades I, II, and III, respectively.
conclusionThe new screening recommendation system based on serum levels of CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4 is an effective approach for detecting GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28028765What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.