Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28028613›Full record

ArticleExtremophiles : life under extreme conditions2017

Microbial diversity and autotrophic activity in Kamchatka hot springs.

Alexander Yu Merkel, Nikolay V Pimenov, Igor I Rusanov, Alexander I Slobodkin, Galina B Slobodkina, Ivan Yu Tarnovetckii, Evgeny N Frolov, Arseny V Dubin, Anna A Perevalova, Elizaveta A Bonch-Osmolovskaya

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparative Gut Microbiome inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander Yu MerkelWinogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospekt 33, Build. 2, Moscow, 119071, Russia.
Nikolay V PimenovWinogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospekt 33, Build. 2, Moscow, 119071, Russia.
Igor I RusanovWinogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospekt 33, Build. 2, Moscow, 119071, Russia.
Alexander I SlobodkinWinogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospekt 33, Build. 2, Moscow, 119071, Russia.
Galina B SlobodkinaWinogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospekt 33, Build. 2, Moscow, 119071, Russia.
Ivan Yu TarnovetckiiWinogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospekt 33, Build. 2, Moscow, 119071, Russia.
Evgeny N FrolovWinogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospekt 33, Build. 2, Moscow, 119071, Russia.
Arseny V DubinWinogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospekt 33, Build. 2, Moscow, 119071, Russia.
Anna A PerevalovaWinogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospekt 33, Build. 2, Moscow, 119071, Russia.
Elizaveta A Bonch-OsmolovskayaWinogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospekt 33, Build. 2, Moscow, 119071, Russia. elizaveta.bo@gmail.com.
Russian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial communities of Kamchatka Peninsula terrestrial hot springs were studied using molecular, radioisotopic and cultural approaches. Analysis of 16S rRNA gene fragments performed by means of high-throughput sequencing revealed that aerobic autotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria of the genus Sulfurihydrogenibium (phylum Aquificae) dominated in a majority of streamers. Another widely distributed and abundant group was that of anaerobic bacteria of the genus Caldimicrobium (phylum Thermodesulfobacteria). Archaea of the genus Vulcanisaeta were abundant in a high-temperature, slightly acidic hot spring, where they were accompanied by numerous Nanoarchaeota, while the domination of uncultured Thermoplasmataceae A10 was characteristic for moderately thermophilic acidic habitats. The highest rates of inorganic carbon assimilation determined by the in situ incubation of samples in the presence of

Indexed as

Water MicrobiologyArchaeaAutotrophic ProcessesGram-Positive BacteriaHot SpringsSiberiaArchaeaCaldimicrobiumCarbon assimilationLithoautotrophsSulfur disproportionationSulfurihydrogenibiumTerrestrial hot springs

Identifiers

PMID28028613
OpenAlexW2565142687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.