ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2017
Incidence and clinical outcomes of intestinal Behçet's disease in Korea, 2011-2014: a nationwide population-based study.
Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of body mass index on clinical outcomes in intestinal Behçet's disease.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2025Article
- Behçet's disease: incidence, prevalence, and real-word data on the use of biologic agents in Japan.Journal of gastroenterology · 2025Observational
- Intestinal Behçet's disease: A review of clinical diagnosis and treatment.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Possible Association of Mutations in theJournal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical Course of Patients with Intestinal Behçet's Disease According to Consensus-Based Diagnostic Categories.Gut and liver · 2022Article
- Clinical heterogeneity of ocular Behçet's syndrome versus intestinal Behçet's syndrome: a cross-sectional study from Shanghai Behçet's syndrome database.Arthritis research & therapy · 2022Article
- Epidemiologic and Etiological Features of Korean Patients With Behçet's Disease.Journal of rheumatic diseases · 2021Review
- Clinical characteristics and risk factors of intestinal involvement in Behçet's syndrome patients: a cross-sectional study from a single center.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2021Article
- Cluster analysis of phenotypes of patients with Behçet's syndrome: a large cohort study from a referral center in China.Arthritis research & therapy · 2021Article
- Advances in Management of Intestinal Behçet's Disease: A Perspective From Gastroenterologists.Journal of rheumatic diseases · 2021Review
- Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy in Intestinal Behçet's Disease.Gut and liver · 2018Review
- Cancer Risk in Patients with Intestinal Behçet's Disease: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.Gut and liver · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntestinal Behçet's disease (BD) is very rare, and epidemiologic data regarding BD are scarce. Moreover, there have been no population-based studies focusing on intestinal BD. We conducted a nationwide population-based study to examine the incidence and clinical course of Korean patients with intestinal BD.
methodsWe collected data on 365 patients diagnosed with intestinal BD from 2011 to 2014 using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Services claims database. We analyzed the incidence and clinical outcomes, including cumulative rates of bowel resection, hospitalization, and medication use.
resultsDuring the study period, the average annual incidence for intestinal BD was 0.18 per 10
conclusionsThe incidence of intestinal BD in Korea is quite low and has been stable in recent years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28028610What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.