Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28028240›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Suppression of 19S proteasome subunits marks emergence of an altered cell state in diverse cancers.

Peter Tsvetkov, Ethan Sokol, Dexter Jin, Zarina Brune, Prathapan Thiru, Mahmoud Ghandi, Levi A Garraway, Piyush B Gupta, Sandro Santagata, Luke Whitesell and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The 19S proteasome as a therapeutic target in hematologic malignancies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. More 26S and 30S proteasomes are beneficial in proteinopathy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Peter TsvetkovWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142; petert@wi.mit.edu.
Ethan SokolWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Dexter JinWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Zarina BruneWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Prathapan ThiruWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Mahmoud GhandiBroad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Levi A GarrawayBroad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Piyush B GuptaWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Sandro SantagataDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
Luke WhitesellWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Susan LindquistWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research · USBroad Institute · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of proteasome inhibitors to target cancer's dependence on altered protein homeostasis has been greatly limited by intrinsic and acquired resistance. Analyzing data from thousands of cancer lines and tumors, we find that those with suppressed expression of one or more 19S proteasome subunits show intrinsic proteasome inhibitor resistance. Moreover, such proteasome subunit suppression is associated with poor outcome in myeloma patients, where proteasome inhibitors are a mainstay of treatment. Beyond conferring resistance to proteasome inhibitors, proteasome subunit suppression also serves as a sentinel of a more global remodeling of the transcriptome. This remodeling produces a distinct gene signature and new vulnerabilities to the proapoptotic drug, ABT-263. This frequent, naturally arising imbalance in 19S regulatory complex composition is achieved through a variety of mechanisms, including DNA methylation, and marks the emergence of a heritably altered and therapeutically relevant state in diverse cancers.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorDNA MethylationDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansNeoplasmsProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProteasome InhibitorsProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProteasome Inhibitorsapoptosisbortezomibdrug resistanceEMTepigenetic gene regulation

Identifiers

PMID28028240
PMCPMC5240730
OpenAlexW2566788322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.