Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28027665›Full record

ArticleAIDS research and human retroviruses2017

Three-Year Durability of Immune Responses Induced by HIV-DNA and HIV-Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara and Effect of a Late HIV-Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara Boost in Tanzanian Volunteers.

Agricola Joachim, Patricia J Munseri, Charlotta Nilsson, Muhammad Bakari, Said Aboud, Eligius F Lyamuya, Teghesti Tecleab, Valentina Liakina, Gabriella Scarlatti, Merlin L Robb and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS research and human retroviruses, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. HIV/AIDS Vaccines: 2018.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Agricola Joachim1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS) , Dar es Salaam, Tanzania .
Patricia J Munseri3 Department of Internal Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS) , Dar es Salaam, Tanzania .
Charlotta Nilsson2 Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden .
Muhammad Bakari3 Department of Internal Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS) , Dar es Salaam, Tanzania .
Said Aboud1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS) , Dar es Salaam, Tanzania .
Eligius F Lyamuya1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS) , Dar es Salaam, Tanzania .
Teghesti Tecleab5 Public Health Agency of Sweden , Solna, Sweden .
Valentina Liakina2 Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden .
Gabriella Scarlatti7 Viral Evolution and Transmission Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute , Milan, Italy .
Merlin L Robb8 The Military HIV Research Program, The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine , Bethesda, Maryland.
Patricia L Earl9 National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)/National Institutes of Health (NIH) , Bethesda, Maryland.
Bernard Moss9 National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)/National Institutes of Health (NIH) , Bethesda, Maryland.
Britta Wahren2 Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden .
Fred Mhalu1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS) , Dar es Salaam, Tanzania .
Guido Ferrari10 Department of Surgery and Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina.
Eric Sandstrom11 Venhälsan, Karolinska Institutet , Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden .
Gunnel Biberfeld2 Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden .
Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZKarolinska Institutet · SEPublic Health Agency of Sweden · SEIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

Social and Behavioral Sciences CoreP30AI064518 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGIA Doris TOMARAS · 2005 to 2026
$50.5M
Recombinant Virus VaccinesZIAAI000416 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI MOSS, BERNARD · 2009 to 2025
$17.3M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI064518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explored the duration of immune responses and the effect of a late third HIV-modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) boost in HIV-DNA primed and HIV-MVA boosted Tanzanian volunteers. Twenty volunteers who had previously received three HIV-DNA and two HIV-MVA immunizations were given a third HIV-MVA immunization 3 years after the second HIV-MVA boost. At the time of the third HIV-MVA, 90% of the vaccinees had antibodies to HIV-1 subtype C gp140 (median titer 200) and 85% to subtype B gp160 (median titer 100). The majority of vaccinees had detectable antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC)-mediating antibodies, 70% against CRF01_AE virus-infected cells (median titer 239) and 84% against CRF01_AE gp120-coated cells (median titer 499). A high proportion (74%) of vaccinees had IFN-γ ELISpot responses, 63% to Gag and 42% to Env, 3 years after the second HIV-MVA boost. After the third HIV-MVA, there was an increase in Env-binding antibodies and ADCC-mediating antibodies relative to the response seen at the time of the third HIV-MVA vaccination, p < .0001 and p < .05, respectively. The frequency of IFN-γ ELISpot responses increased to 95% against Gag or Env and 90% to both Gag and Env, p = .064 and p = .002, respectively. In conclusion, the HIV-DNA prime/HIV-MVA boost regimen elicited potent antibody and cellular immune responses with remarkable durability, and a third HIV-MVA immunization significantly boosted both antibody and cellular immune responses relative to the levels detected at the time of the third HIV-MVA, but not to higher levels than after the second HIV-MVA.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityImmunization, SecondaryAdultAIDS VaccinesAntibody-Dependent Cell CytotoxicityDrug CarriersFemaleHealthy VolunteersHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHumansImmunization ScheduleInterferon-gammaMaleMiddle AgedTanzaniaAIDS VaccinesDrug CarriersHIV AntibodiesInterferon-gammaVaccines, DNAVaccines, SyntheticDNAHIVimmune responseMVAvaccine

Identifiers

PMID28027665
PMCPMC5564012
OpenAlexW2992363429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.