Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28027656›Full record

ArticleAIDS care2017

Sexual identity and behavior in an online sample of Indian men who have sex with men.

Maria L Ekstrand, Shruta Rawat, Pallav Patankar, Elsa Heylen, Asha Banu, B R Simon Rosser, J Michael Wilkerson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. An online study to understand chemsex in India.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. "Barriers to Accessing Targeted Interventions among Key Populations in Jharkhand, India: A Mixed-Methods Study in Two Mining Towns".Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria L Ekstranda Division of Prevention Science, Department of Medicine, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies , University of California , San Francisco , CA , USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7587-2899
Shruta Rawatc The Humsafar Trust , Mumbai , India.ORCID 0000-0001-9248-0272
Pallav Patankarc The Humsafar Trust , Mumbai , India.ORCID 0000-0002-2308-6738
Elsa Heylena Division of Prevention Science, Department of Medicine, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies , University of California , San Francisco , CA , USA.
Asha Banud The Tata Institute of Social Sciences , Mumbai , India.
B R Simon Rossere Division of Epidemiology and Community Health , University of Minnesota , Minneapolis , MN , USA.
J Michael Wilkersonf School of Public Health , The University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston (UTHealth) Houston , TX , USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0815-8577
Humsafar Trust · INUniversity of California, San Francisco · USTata Institute of Social Sciences · INThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Internet-based HIV Prevention for MSM in IndiaR21AI094676 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI WILKERSON, JOHNNY MICHAEL · 2011 to 2012
$383k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI094676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indian men who have sex with men are disproportionately impacted by HIV. While prevention efforts to date have focused on men who visit drop-in centers or physical cruising sites, little is known about men who are meeting sexual partners on virtual platforms. This paper explores issues related to sexual identity and sexual behaviors in an online sample of men who identified as gay (n = 279) or bisexual (n = 123). There were significant differences in outedness between the two groups, with 48% of bisexually identified men reporting that they were out to "no one" and 82% stating that they present themselves as heterosexual to family and friends. Corresponding rates for gay-identified men were 15% and 41%, respectively (both p < .001). Twenty-nine percent of bisexually identified men reported being married, compared to only 3% of the gay-identified men (p < .001). Bisexually identified men were also more likely to report having exclusively insertive anal sex (49% vs 30% p < .001), while gay-identified men were more likely to report exclusively receptive anal sex (41% vs 13% p < .0001). Rates of unprotected anal sex (UAS) in the two groups were similar; however, married men were significantly more likely to report unprotected vaginal sex (76% vs 35%, p < .012). Positive attitudes toward UAS and lower self-efficacy were associated with sexual risk in both groups; however, substance use was associated with sexual risk only among bisexually identified men. These findings show that a large proportion of Indian bisexually identified men lead closeted lives, especially in their interactions with friends and family, with the vast majority presenting as heterosexual. The lower condom use with wives may be due to societal pressures to have children. The results suggest that bisexually identified men may benefit from targeted programs and non-directive, non-judgmental individual or couples counseling which emphasizes condom use with both male and female partners.

Indexed as

BisexualitySexual PartnersAdultCondomsFemaleHeterosexualityHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedRisk-TakingSubstance-Related DisordersUnsafe SexbisexualgayIndiamen who have sex with mensexual behaviorSexual identity

Identifiers

PMID28027656
PMCPMC5575865
OpenAlexW2564393348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.