Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28027326›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2016

Haemophilus ducreyi Cutaneous Ulcer Strains Diverged from Both Class I and Class II Genital Ulcer Strains: Implications for Epidemiological Studies.

Dharanesh Gangaiah, Stanley M Spinola

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Class IInfection and immunity · 2019
    Trial
  2. Molecular pathogenesis ofMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  3. Infections caused byClinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay for the Detection ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  7. Interactions of the Skin PathogenFrontiers in immunology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Multiple Class I and Class II Haemophilus ducreyi Strains Cause Cutaneous Ulcers in Children on an Endemic Island.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dharanesh GangaiahDepartments of Microbiology and Immunology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America.
Stanley M SpinolaDepartments of Microbiology and Immunology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3435-9911
Indiana University School of Medicine

Funding

PATHOGENESIS OF HAEMOPHILUS DUCREYI INFECTIONSR01AI027863 · NIAID · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI SPINOLA, STANLEY M. · 1995 to 2013
$3.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI027863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHaemophilus ducreyi has emerged as a major cause of cutaneous ulcers (CU) in yaws-endemic regions of the tropics in the South Pacific, South East Asia and Africa. H. ducreyi was once thought only to cause the genital ulcer (GU) disease chancroid; GU strains belong to 2 distinct classes, class I and class II. Using whole-genome sequencing of 4 CU strains from Samoa, 1 from Vanuatu and 1 from Papua New Guinea, we showed that CU strains diverged from the class I strain 35000HP and that one CU strain expressed β-lactamase. Recently, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention released the genomes of 11 additional CU strains from Vanuatu and Ghana; however, the evolutionary relationship of these CU strains to previously-characterized CU and GU strains is unknown. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe performed phylogenetic analysis of 17 CU and 10 GU strains. Class I and class II GU strains formed two distinct clades. The class I strains formed two subclades, one containing 35000HP and HD183 and the other containing the remainder of the class I strains. Twelve of the CU strains formed a subclone under the class I 35000HP subclade, while 2 CU strains formed a subclone under the other class I subclade. Unexpectedly, 3 of the CU strains formed a subclone under the class II clade. Phylogenetic analysis of dsrA-hgbA-ncaA sequences yielded a tree similar to that of whole-genome phylogenetic tree. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: CU strains diverged from multiple lineages within both class I and class II GU strains. Multilocus sequence typing of dsrA-hgbA-ncaA could be reliably used for epidemiological investigation of CU and GU strains. As class II strains grow relatively poorly and are relatively more susceptible to vancomycin than class I strains, these findings have implications for methods to recover CU strains. Comparison of contemporary CU and GU isolates would help clarify the relationship between these entities.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialChancroidHaemophilus ducreyiHumansPapua New GuineaPhylogenyPolynesiaSkin UlcerVanuatu

Identifiers

PMID28027326
PMCPMC5222509
OpenAlexW2561515400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.